1995
DOI: 10.2307/2155050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triangles of Groups

Abstract: Abstract.Given a certain commutative diagram of groups and monomorphisms, does there necessarily exist a group in which the given diagram is essentially a diagram of subgroups and inclusions? In general, the answer is negative, but J. Corson, and Gersten and Stallings have shown that in the case of a "nonspherical triangle" of groups the answer is positive. This paper improves on these results by weakening the non-sphericality requirement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result holds for non-spherical Corson diagrams, see [13]. While these two results can be proved by nice arguments based on Euler's formula for planar graphs, spherical Corson diagrams are much harder to investigate, see, for example, [2,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A similar result holds for non-spherical Corson diagrams, see [13]. While these two results can be proved by nice arguments based on Euler's formula for planar graphs, spherical Corson diagrams are much harder to investigate, see, for example, [2,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%