Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2008 2008
DOI: 10.5244/c.22.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triangulation from Two Views Revisited: Hartley-Sturm vs. Optimal Correction

Abstract: A higher order scheme is presented for the optimal correction method of Kanatani [5] for triangulation from two views and is compared with the method of Hartley and Sturm [3]. It is pointed out that the epipole is a singularity of the Hartley-Sturm method, while the proposed method has no singularity. Numerical simulation confirms that both compute identical solutions at other points. However, the proposed method is significantly faster.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is used to measure the degree by which F deviates from satisfying the singularity constraint. The reprojection error of a given correspondence M M M i with respect to F was measured by first correcting M M M i intoM M M i with Kanatani's iterative correction [13] and measuring the distance between M M M i andM M M i .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used to measure the degree by which F deviates from satisfying the singularity constraint. The reprojection error of a given correspondence M M M i with respect to F was measured by first correcting M M M i intoM M M i with Kanatani's iterative correction [13] and measuring the distance between M M M i andM M M i .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate a given fundamental matrix F and a set of n matches (x i , x ′ i ) 1≤i≤n we use the implementation of Kanatani [8] 8 to compute the optimal matches for the given data; we use as measure the RMSE of the reprojection error associated to these optimal matches.…”
Section: Optimal Reprojection Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We added independent Gaussian noise of mean 0 and standard deviation σ pixels to the x and y coordinates of each of the grid points in these images and computed their 3-D positionsr α andr α by the method described in [15]. For optimal similarity estimation, we need to evaluate the normalized covariances V 0 [r α ] and V 0 [r α ] of the reconstructed 3-D positionsr α and r α .…”
Section: Covariance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%