“…Immobilization of photocatalysts/sensitizers in porous materials offers the advantage of conducting O 2 -mediated reactions in a heterogeneous phase in a recyclable fashion, obviating disposal of the catalyst at the end of the reaction. Several porous materials, e.g., covalent organic frameworks (COFs), covalent triazine frameworks, porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs), etc., constructed from building blocks like triazine, pyrene, porphyrin, thiophene, sulfone, etc., − have been exemplified as photocatalysts for applications which include water splitting, dye degradation, CO 2 reduction, and catalysis. − In particular, amorphous porous organic polymers (POPs), constructed by covalent polymerization of organic building blocks in a bottom-up fashion, , as photocatalysts are advantageous for the following reasons: (i) they are unrivalled for their physicochemical stabilities, (ii) their band gap energies and absorption in the visible region can be tuned by manipulating the structures of the monomeric building blocks to develop tailored-made materials for photocatalytic applications; (iii) their high surface areas, permanent porosity, and tunable pore size enable control over molecular diffusion and access of the reactants to catalytically active sites; (iv) they permit selectivity in catalytic oxidation reactions, cost-effectiveness, etc. Consequently, POPs have assumed prominence as inextricable materials for diverse applications over the past decade. − …”