2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.135181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triazole‐tethered boswellic acid derivatives against breast cancer: Synthesis, in vitro, and in‐silico studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides modulating channel activity, the protective effect of urea may in part be related to sphingomyelinase inhibition [29]. Of note, structural modifications may potentially reduce the toxicity of ERN to off-target tissue while preserving or enhancing its anticancer properties [44]. Interestingly, oncolytic viruses may also be exploited as vehicles of chemotherapeutic agents, which augments their anticancer potential to overcome chemoresistance [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides modulating channel activity, the protective effect of urea may in part be related to sphingomyelinase inhibition [29]. Of note, structural modifications may potentially reduce the toxicity of ERN to off-target tissue while preserving or enhancing its anticancer properties [44]. Interestingly, oncolytic viruses may also be exploited as vehicles of chemotherapeutic agents, which augments their anticancer potential to overcome chemoresistance [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…triazole moiety increased the activity to some extent. [118] Among was not inferior to doxorubicin (IC 50 : 4.17 µM) against MCF-7 breast cancer cells, [119] whereas 1,2,3-triazole-indole-forskolin hybrid 94…”
Section: Indole-pyridine/quinoline Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…1,2,3‐Triazole‐boswellic acid hybrids 92 (Figure 13; IC 50 : 4.45–6.65 µM, MTT assay) were more potent than acetyl‐11‐keto‐β‐boswellic acid (β‐AKBA; IC 50 : 17.27 µM) against MDA‐MB‐231 breast cancer cells, and the SAR illustrated that introduction of electron‐withdrawing group into phenyl ring at N‐1 position of 1,2,3‐triazole moiety increased the activity to some extent. [ 118 ] Among them, hybrids 92a,b (IC 50 : 4.45 and 5.01 µM) which were found to be most active against MDA‐MB‐231 breast cancer cells displayed low cytotoxicity (IC 50 : >20 µM) toward normal MCF‐10A breast cells. 1,2,3‐Triazole‐levonorgestrel hybrid 93 (IC 50 : 7.48 µM, MTT assay) was not inferior to doxorubicin (IC 50 : 4.17 µM) against MCF‐7 breast cancer cells, [ 119 ] whereas 1,2,3‐triazole‐indole‐forskolin hybrid 94 (IC 50 : 9.93 and 6.00 µM, MTT assay) was comparable to doxorubicin (IC 50 : 1.65 and 1.97 µM) against MCF‐7 and MDA‐MB‐231 breast cancer cell lines, [ 120 ] demonstrating their potential as novel lead compounds for the exploitation of novel anti‐breast cancer candidates.…”
Section: 23‐triazole‐steroid Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our lab, we attempted new approaches to explore and modify bioactive natural products using molecular biology tools, in silico investigations, derivatization strategies, and pharmaceutical formulations. So, the successful stories of hybridization of boswellic acids as anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic agents, and antidiabetic agents encouraged us to pursue novel new hybrids based on AKBA and other anti-inflammatory and antioxidant natural products; these hybrids will be evaluated for their ability to mitigate APAP toxicity in vitro . Furthermore, gene enrichment for the elucidation of potential targets of the compounds would be addressed and supported by molecular docking studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%