2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2019.106055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribological and conductive behavior of Cu/Cu rolling current-carrying pairs in a water environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial current was set as 0, 1.0, and 1.5 A, which was the same as our previous work. 19) The tests under each working condition were repeated 5 times. Before and after each rolling experiment, the average temperature of the rolling surface was measured by an Infrared Thermometer (SMART SENSOR, AS-852B+).…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The initial current was set as 0, 1.0, and 1.5 A, which was the same as our previous work. 19) The tests under each working condition were repeated 5 times. Before and after each rolling experiment, the average temperature of the rolling surface was measured by an Infrared Thermometer (SMART SENSOR, AS-852B+).…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the current could also promote the formation of pits and the surface oxidation. 14,19,28) Erosion pits and current pulse were the typical characteristics of the arc between the current-carrying contact pairs. 2931) Based on the surface characterization and the current-carrying behaviors, it was speculated that arc discharge should take place under some conditions of high speed and large current.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Rolling Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can well explain the observed phenomena of potential-controlled boundary lubrication for pure liquids and the triboelectrochemical reaction products in friction contact area. Most importantly, the model is expected to provide a theoretical basis for many other solid-liquid interface processes under the effects of electromechanical coupling, such as the scratching of the surface under electrochemical conditions (Wang and Li, 2005), the highly efficient electrochemical mechanical polishing (Joo and Liang, 2013;Li et al, 2013), the rolling current-carrying contact in wet environment (Sun et al, 2019;Sun et al, 2020), and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the COF of nitride H-13 steel at the macroscale was found to be lower than that for the pristine H-13 steel, although the wear depth of nitride H-13 steel was higher than that of the pristine sample owing to increased material exfoliation. For semiconductors, Yu et al [9,10,[14][15][16] found that the surface hydrophilicity exhibited a critical effect on the nanotribological properties of Si(100): The interfacial water-film increased both the capillary force and friction force, as well as water-related tribo-chemical wear. However, the surface hydrophilicity hardly affected the macro-tribological performance of Si(100) because asperities can easily penetrate the interfacial water-film owing to the very high local contact-pressure due to the multiasperity contact [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%