2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.504-506.543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribological Behaviour of PVD Coatings for Sheet Metal Forming Tools: Laboratory and Industrial Evaluation

Abstract: In the last decades, Physical Vapour Deposition (PVD) and Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD) processes have been significantly improved and optimized for the applications on dies for sheet metal forming processes. However, due to the different contact conditions at dies-blank interfaces, and the wide range of applied contact pressures, the selection of the correct coating may be still affected by trials-and-error approaches. Although many methods to evaluate the tribological performances of such coatings can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thickness of the deposited layers was determined by Calotest and reached 2.6 µm for TiAlNmulti layer and 1.8 µm for nACo layer. The method is described in detail in [18,19]. The roughness of the layers was tested by profilometer Hommel Tester T 1000 and achieved Ra = 0.09 µm for TiAlNmulti and Ra = 0.07 µm for nACo.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thickness of the deposited layers was determined by Calotest and reached 2.6 µm for TiAlNmulti layer and 1.8 µm for nACo layer. The method is described in detail in [18,19]. The roughness of the layers was tested by profilometer Hommel Tester T 1000 and achieved Ra = 0.09 µm for TiAlNmulti and Ra = 0.07 µm for nACo.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review on PVD and CVD coatings reveals that many efforts have been produced in studying and analyzing the performances of new coatings by different approaches and techniques. Some Authors compared the behaviour of different coatings using laboratory approaches, such as pin-on-disk tests [4,5,6,7], while others focused on direct observations made on production dies or developed specific on-field tests to reproduce accurately the same conditions of the industrial process, such as in [8,9,10]. Both the above-mentioned methodologies may provide useful information concerning the coatings performances, but the former are sometimes far from the industrial conditions and the latter result too much related to the specific process conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%