2016
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribology of flexible and sliding spinal implants: Development of experimental and numerical models

Abstract: New fusionless devices are being developed to get over the limits of actual spinal surgical treatment, based on arthrodesis. However, due to their recentness, no standards exist to test and validate those devices, especially concerning the wear. A new tribological first approach to the definition of an in vitro wear protocol to study wear of flexible and sliding spinal devices is presented in this article, and was applied to a new concept. A simplified synthetic spine portion (polyethylene) was developed to re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In additional to the articulating surfaces, the fixation interface which has not received enough attention previously, was also extensively considered [358,359] and also in conjunction with wear testing of the bearing surfaces [360]. Modular interfaces with fretting corrosion were increasingly studied at the hip [318, 361−363], the knee [364], and the spine [365,366] and for new materials combinations of PEEK and XLPE [367]. The contact between implant and bone was also an important consideration [368].…”
Section: Joint Tribologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In additional to the articulating surfaces, the fixation interface which has not received enough attention previously, was also extensively considered [358,359] and also in conjunction with wear testing of the bearing surfaces [360]. Modular interfaces with fretting corrosion were increasingly studied at the hip [318, 361−363], the knee [364], and the spine [365,366] and for new materials combinations of PEEK and XLPE [367]. The contact between implant and bone was also an important consideration [368].…”
Section: Joint Tribologymentioning
confidence: 99%