2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11172-012-0093-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trichloro- and methyldichlorogermyl monochelates and dibromo- and dichlorogermyl bischelates derived from N,N-disubstituted amides of 2-hydroxycarboxylic acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bond lengths of germanium and two oxygens were the same as 1.927(3) Å, respectively, and the length with chlorine was 2.275(13) Å (shown in Table ). The Ge–Cl in complex 1 has a longer distance than those of reported tetravalent complexes such as Cl 3 Ge­[OCHMeC­(O)­NR 1 ], Cl 2 MeGe­[OCHR 2 C­(O)­NMe], Ge­(EthdH_1) 2 Cl 2 , and Cl 2 Ge­[OCH 2 C­(O)­NR 3 ] (R 1 = Me 2 , (CH 2 ) 4 , (CH 2 ) 5 ; R 2 = (CH 2 ) 5 , Me, H; R 3 =(CH 2 CH 2 ) 2 O, (CH 2 ) 5 ) with 2.139(5)–2.270(6) Å, but is within the range of bond length. , Ge­(II)–Cl bond lengths are longer than the Ge­(IV) bond lengths because the Ge­(II) ion is slightly larger than the Ge­(IV) ion. To investigate the solid-state structures of the newly designed complexes, we applied an mba ligand with good packing ability by a phenyl group.…”
Section: Tgamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bond lengths of germanium and two oxygens were the same as 1.927(3) Å, respectively, and the length with chlorine was 2.275(13) Å (shown in Table ). The Ge–Cl in complex 1 has a longer distance than those of reported tetravalent complexes such as Cl 3 Ge­[OCHMeC­(O)­NR 1 ], Cl 2 MeGe­[OCHR 2 C­(O)­NMe], Ge­(EthdH_1) 2 Cl 2 , and Cl 2 Ge­[OCH 2 C­(O)­NR 3 ] (R 1 = Me 2 , (CH 2 ) 4 , (CH 2 ) 5 ; R 2 = (CH 2 ) 5 , Me, H; R 3 =(CH 2 CH 2 ) 2 O, (CH 2 ) 5 ) with 2.139(5)–2.270(6) Å, but is within the range of bond length. , Ge­(II)–Cl bond lengths are longer than the Ge­(IV) bond lengths because the Ge­(II) ion is slightly larger than the Ge­(IV) ion. To investigate the solid-state structures of the newly designed complexes, we applied an mba ligand with good packing ability by a phenyl group.…”
Section: Tgamentioning
confidence: 99%