1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-328x(94)84138-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trichlorostannato(diphosphine)rhodium(I) complexes. Crystal structure of [Rh(SnCl3)(1,5-cyclooctadiene)(dppp)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 The Rh-Sn bond distances for 3, at 2.5644( 5) Å (Rh-Sn1), 2.5829(5) Å (Rh-Sn2), and 2.5662(5) Å (Rh-Sn3), are situated at the lower limit of known Rh-Sn bond lengths, which range from 2.526(1) Å in Rh[Sn(N t Bu) 2 SiMe 2 ] 5 Cl to 2.651(2) Å in [Rh(SnCl 3 )(NBD)(dppb)] (NBD ) norbornadiene, dppb ) 1,4bis(diphenylphosphino)butane). [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] A similar value is found The second complex, which is contained in the asymmetric unit, the solvent molecules, and H atoms have been omitted, and phenyl rings are symbolized by the ipso C for clarity. Selected bond distances and angles of this selected complex are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 The Rh-Sn bond distances for 3, at 2.5644( 5) Å (Rh-Sn1), 2.5829(5) Å (Rh-Sn2), and 2.5662(5) Å (Rh-Sn3), are situated at the lower limit of known Rh-Sn bond lengths, which range from 2.526(1) Å in Rh[Sn(N t Bu) 2 SiMe 2 ] 5 Cl to 2.651(2) Å in [Rh(SnCl 3 )(NBD)(dppb)] (NBD ) norbornadiene, dppb ) 1,4bis(diphenylphosphino)butane). [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] A similar value is found The second complex, which is contained in the asymmetric unit, the solvent molecules, and H atoms have been omitted, and phenyl rings are symbolized by the ipso C for clarity. Selected bond distances and angles of this selected complex are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The Rh−Sn bond distances for 3 , at 2.5644(5) Å (Rh−Sn1), 2.5829(5) Å (Rh−Sn2), and 2.5662(5) Å (Rh−Sn3), are situated at the lower limit of known Rh−Sn bond lengths, which range from 2.526(1) Å in Rh[Sn(N t Bu) 2 SiMe 2 ] 5 Cl to 2.651(2) Å in [Rh(SnCl 3 )(NBD)(dppb)] (NBD = norbornadiene, dppb = 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane). A similar value is found in coordination compound [Rh(bipy‘)(Cp*)(SnB 11 H 11 )] (bipy‘ = 4,4‘-di- tert -butyl-2,2‘-bipyridine, Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadiene), which includes also a tin-containing icosahedral boron cluster molecule, [SnB 11 H 11 ] 2- : Rh−Sn = 2.578(1) Å. Complex 3 adopts nearly perfect trigonal bipyramidal symmetry with negligible distortion, which is reflected in the axial bond angle of P1−Rh−P2, which is close to linearity at 175.90(5)°, the in-plane bond angles Sn−Rh−Sn, with an average value of 119.99°, and the P−Rh−Sn angles between the perpendicular axis and the plane, with an average value of 90.03°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Rh–C distance is also longer than the Rh–C bond found in complex 1 , which can be explained by the stronger trans influence of the trichlorostannate in comparison to the chloride ligand . The Rh–Sn bond length of 2.55873(6) Å lies in the range of Rh–SnCl 3 derivatives reported earlier. Coordination of the pyridine ligand at Rh­(III) in complex 3 exhibits a typical Rh–N bond length of 2.221(5) Å, indicating trans coordination to a ligand with a strong trans influence. , The hydride ligand was placed in a calculated position and refined with a fixed geometry.…”
Section: Results and Discusssionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The ability of crystal-packing forces to influence the P−Rh−P bite angle over a span of 5 degrees indicates that ( S,S )- i -Pr-BPP is relatively flexible in its bond angle preference. Likewise, rhodium complexes of three other carbon-bridged bisphosphines have been reported to adopt bite angles from 86.0° in [Rh(SnCl 3 )(1,5-cyclooctadiene)(Ph 2 PCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 )] to 96.97° in Rh(η 3 -CH 2 Ph)[( i- Pr) 2 PCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 P( i -Pr) 2 ] . The hydroformylation results obtained with ( S,S )-Ph-BPP suggest that bite angles near that found for ( S,S )-Ph-BPE can be accessed during the catalytic cycle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of 5 degrees indicates that (S,S)-i-Pr-BPP is relatively flexible in its bond angle preference. Likewise, rhodium complexes of three other carbon-bridged bisphosphines have been reported to adopt bite angles from 86.0°in [Rh(SnCl 3 )(1,5-cyclooctadiene)(Ph 2 PCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 )]20 to 96.97°in Rh(η 3 -CH 2 Ph)[(i-Pr) 2 PCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 P(i-Pr) 2 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%