“…Ten out of 29 patients (34%) had RV dysfunction (defined by RV-FAC<35%). RV-LSF (15 [11-20] % vs 25 [21-29] %; p=0.002) and TAD lat (13 [11-20] mm vs 21 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 mm, p=0.008) were significantly decreased in the RV dysfunction group. No difference was found between the 2 groups for 2D-strain parameters, TAPSE (22 [20-25] mm vs 24 [21-26] mm;p=0.28) and RV-S’(14 [13-19] cm.s −1 vs 18 [13-20] cm.s −1 ; p=0.77) ( Appendix 2 ) .…”