2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2006.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tridentate facial coordination mode of an unsymmetrical tetradentate diazine ligand in an iron(III) complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average distances of the bonds Fe III –O phenolate (1.8651 Å), Fe III –N imine (1.9401 Å) and Fe III –N amine (2.049 Å) are consistent with the low-spin state of iron(III) in a pseudooctahedral geometry. Typically, octahedral LS distances of Fe III –O phenolate , Fe III –N imine , and Fe III –N amine are in the ranges 1.85–1.89, ,,, 1.92–1.96, ,,, and 2.02–2.08 Å, ,, respectively, whereas the corresponding distances for HS iron(III) are in the ranges 1.89–1.93, ,,,, 2.09–2.15, ,,, and 2.18–2.26 Å, ,,, respectively. These variations of bond distances with spin state are readily explained using MO theory which shows an antibonding (d σ *) HOMO in HS octahedral iron(III) complexes, but a nonbonding (d π ) HOMO in the corresponding LS complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average distances of the bonds Fe III –O phenolate (1.8651 Å), Fe III –N imine (1.9401 Å) and Fe III –N amine (2.049 Å) are consistent with the low-spin state of iron(III) in a pseudooctahedral geometry. Typically, octahedral LS distances of Fe III –O phenolate , Fe III –N imine , and Fe III –N amine are in the ranges 1.85–1.89, ,,, 1.92–1.96, ,,, and 2.02–2.08 Å, ,, respectively, whereas the corresponding distances for HS iron(III) are in the ranges 1.89–1.93, ,,,, 2.09–2.15, ,,, and 2.18–2.26 Å, ,,, respectively. These variations of bond distances with spin state are readily explained using MO theory which shows an antibonding (d σ *) HOMO in HS octahedral iron(III) complexes, but a nonbonding (d π ) HOMO in the corresponding LS complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zinc(II) complexes are naturally diamagnetic and exhibit no d-d transition; all their UV bands can be assigned to p-p* transitions of the azomethine chromophore of the ligands. (9) C (14) C (3,4) C (2,5,6,(10)(11)(12)(13) C (13) C (18) C (2,5,6,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) Table 5 UV-vis spectral data for the ligands and complexes a A 2 /A 1 = x/(100 -x) where A 1 = the absorbance of the phenol-imine form (p-p*); A 2 = the absorbance of the keto-amine form (n-p*); x = the percentage of ketoamine form b Keto-amine form 0% in basic medium. Basic medium is attained by addition of NEt 3 (1 mL) to the given solution (ligand concentration: 1 9 10 -5 mol dm -3 ) c Acidic medium is attained by addition of CF 3 COOH (1 mL) to the given solution (ligand concentration: …”
Section: Electronic Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordination chemistry of substituted hydrazones has received further impetus from applications such as anti-viral or anti-inflammatory agents in either the free ligands or their metal complexes [9]. Although symmetric diazine ligands have been extensively studied, there is no report on their complexes with bisSchiff bases of hydrazine which are asymmetrical with respect to the two chelating sites [10]. Crown ethers are of interest in the area of molecular recognition [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%