“…DFT studies on fluoride migration reactions in trans ‐[Ir(Cl)(F)(SF 3 )(CO)(PEt 3 ) 2 ] ( 119 ), [M(SF 3 )(CO) n ] (M=V ( 131 a ), Ta ( 131 b ), n =5; M=Mn ( 131 c ), Re ( 131 d ), n =4; M=Co ( 131 e ), Ir ( 131 f ), n =3) and [CpM(SF 3 )(CO) n ] (Cp=η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 ; M=Cr ( 132 a ), W ( 132 b ), n =2; M=Fe ( 132 c ), Os ( 132 d ), n =1; M=Ni ( 132 e ), Pt ( 132 f ), n =0) to form the respective {[M](F)(SF 2 )} complexes suggest an instability of SF 3 ligands at first‐ and third‐row transition‐metal derivatives . Exceptional cases are both iridium‐based compounds, for which a fluoride shift in [Ir(SF 3 )(CO) 3 ] ( 131 f ) is almost thermoneutral and is clearly energetically not favored in trans ‐[Ir(Cl)(F)(SF 3 )(CO)(PEt 3 ) 2 ] ( 119 ) . Substitution of one of the sulfur bound fluorine atoms by NMe 2 again resulted in an energetically favored fluoride shift for {M[SF 2 (NMe 2 )](CO) n } [M=Ta, n =5 ( 133 a ); M=Re, n =4 ( 133 b ); M=Ir, n =3 ( 133 c )] and {CpM[SF 2 (NMe 2 )](CO) n } [Cp=η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 ; M=Cr ( 134 a ), Mo ( 134 b ), W ( 134 c ), n =2; M=Os, n =1 ( 134 d ); M=Pt, n =0 ( 134 e )] to yield the respective {[M](F)[SF(NMe 2 )]} complexes .…”