2017
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trigeminal neurofibroma in the infratemporal fossa arising from the inferior alveolar nerve: A case report

Abstract: Solitary neurofibromas arising from cranial nerves are rare, and those arising from the peripheral divisions of the trigeminal nerve are even rarer. Although infratemporal fossa (ITF) masses are challenging to remove, certain approaches are considered feasible for this region. The present study reports a rare case of an ITF neurofibroma arising from the inferior alveolar nerve. The 27-year-old male patient presented with numbness of the right jaw. A radiological examination revealed a large mass occupying the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 By contrast, one must consider the differential diagnosis of neurofibroma, particularly in children with neurofibromatosis type 1, which originates from the nerve or perineural cells. 30 This diagnosis necessitates destruction of the nerve to achieve resection, with potentially significant consequences for development. In general, neurofibroma resection should be limited to the offending component rather than extirpation of all the involved branches of the trigeminal nerve, which would not be feasible or advisable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 By contrast, one must consider the differential diagnosis of neurofibroma, particularly in children with neurofibromatosis type 1, which originates from the nerve or perineural cells. 30 This diagnosis necessitates destruction of the nerve to achieve resection, with potentially significant consequences for development. In general, neurofibroma resection should be limited to the offending component rather than extirpation of all the involved branches of the trigeminal nerve, which would not be feasible or advisable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%