2006
DOI: 10.1002/ange.200601352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trigonal Pyramids: Alternative Ground‐State Structures for Sixteen‐Electron Complexes

Abstract: [1] However, apart from tetrahedral structure T, which is observed for high-spin transition metals from the 4th period, [2] sawhorse (SH, C 2v ) and trigonalpyramidal structures (TP, C 3v ) are alternatives (Scheme 1).[3]The highly reactive transient carbonyls [M(CO) 4 ] (M = Fe, Ru, Os) have SH structures, [4a-c] as do a few recently isolated Ru 0 and Rh I complexes, which show remarkable reactivity.Even computationally, the TP structure has been rarely considered. Pidun and Frenking investigated by DFT met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cal approaches the extreme case of a trigonal pyramid, in which the PRhP angle would be 90°. This structural feature was recently observed for the bistropsilyl complex [Rh(trop 2 SiMe)(PPh 3 )] for which we assumed—because of the strong σ‐electron donation of the silyl group—a strong contribution of the resonance form A (Scheme ) and enhanced electron density at the metal center 13. A more detailed interpretation of the different electronic structures of 6 L .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…cal approaches the extreme case of a trigonal pyramid, in which the PRhP angle would be 90°. This structural feature was recently observed for the bistropsilyl complex [Rh(trop 2 SiMe)(PPh 3 )] for which we assumed—because of the strong σ‐electron donation of the silyl group—a strong contribution of the resonance form A (Scheme ) and enhanced electron density at the metal center 13. A more detailed interpretation of the different electronic structures of 6 L .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The structure of trop 3 P is very rigid and the phosphorus atom is deeply embedded in a concave pocket formed by the three trop substituents. This makes the phosphane infinitely stable against oxidation on air and long reaction times are needed for converting trop 3 P into the corresponding thiophosphorane, trop 3 [49] with M = Rh I , Ir I , and Pd II to which a fifth ligand X = Cl -, H 2 O binds in the remaining axial position. Structural and NMR spectroscopic data suggest that π-backbonding from filled d-orbitals at the transition metal center to the π* orbitals of the coordinated C=C double bonds increases as expected in the order Pd II Ͻ Rh I Ͻ Ir I .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordination chemistry of d 8 RhL 4 complexes is dominated by their strong propensity to adopt square‐planar geometries. Nonetheless, some rare sawhorse (SH)1 environments have also been reported, while the amazing compound, [Rh(trop 2 SiMe)(C 2 H 4 )] (trop 2 SiMe=bis(5 H ‐dibenzo[ a , d ]cyclohepten‐5‐yl)methylsilane), remains the sole example for the related trigonal pyramid (TP) geometry 2. In fact, SH and TP structures can be envisaged as derived formally from a trigonal bipyramid (TBPY) geometry lacking either one equatorial or one axial ligand, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(trop 2 SiMe = bis(5H-dibenzo [a,d]cyclohepten-5-yl)methylsilane), remains the sole example for the related trigonal pyramid (TP) geometry. [2] In fact, SH and TP structures can be envisaged as derived formally from a trigonal bipyramid (TBPY) geometry lacking either one equatorial or one axial ligand, respectively. Noticeably, some of these complexes exhibit very rich non-conventional chemical reactivity, [3] including dinuclear CÀH bond activation reactions, [4] and unusual electromeric rhodium radical complexes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation