The reaction of 1,1'-Li 2 [(2,2'-C 2 B 10 H 10 ) 2 ]w ith the cyclometallated gold(III) complex( C^N)AuCl 2 afforded the first examples of gold(III) dicarboranyl complexes. The reactivity of these complexes is subject to the trans-influence exerted by the dicarboranyl ligand,w hichi ss ubstantially weaker than that of non-carboranyl anionic C-ligands. In line with this, displacemento fc oordinated pyridine by chloride is only possible under forcing conditions. While treatment of (C^N)Au{(2,2'-C 2 B 10 H 10 ) 2 }( 2)w ith triflic acid leads to AuÀC rather than AuÀNb ond protonolysis, aqueous HBr cleaves the AuÀNb ond to give the pyridinium bromo complex 7.The trans-influence of as eries of ligands including dicarboranyl and bis(dicarboranyl) was assessed by meansofD FT calculations. The analysis demonstrated that it was not suffi-cient to rely exclusively on geometricd escriptors (calculated or experimental) when attempting to rank ligands fort heir trans influence. Complex( C^N)Au(C 2 B 10 H 11 ) 2 containing two non-chelating dicarboranyll igandsw as prepared similar to 2.I ts reaction with trifluoroacetic acida lso leads to AuÀN cleavage to give trans-(Hpy^C)Au(OAc F )(C 2 B 10 H 11 ) 2 (8). In crystals of 8 the pyridiniumN ÀHb ond points towards the metal centre, while in 7 it is bent away.T he possible contribution of gold(III)···HÀNh ydrogen bonding in these complexes was investigated by DFT calculations. The results show that, unlike the situation for platinum(II), there is no evidencef or an energeticallys ignificant contribution by hydrogen bonding in the case of gold(III).