1978
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.75.2.740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triphosphate residues at the 5' ends of rRNA precursor and 5S RNA from Dictyostelium discoideum.

Abstract: We present here direct evidence for the preservation of a transcriptional initiation sequence in a eukaryotic rRNA precursor: the 5'-end group for precursor to 17S rRNA (pl7S RNA) from Dictyostelium discoideum is identified as the triphosphate residue pppA-. We also show that mature 5S RNA from Dictyostelium bears a different triphosphate residue, pppG-. In contrast, we find no evidence for more than one phosphate at the 5' end of the 25S rRNA precursor (p25S RNA). These observations indicate that synthesis of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These predictions hold true for actin and tubulin (ACT2 and TUB8) mRNA controls, transcribed by Pol II, which were significantly more depleted by Treatment A than by Treatments B or C, consistent with these mRNAs bearing 7-methylG caps (Figure 2D). By contrast, a Pol I-transcribed control transcript, 45S pre-rRNA, which is expected to have a 5’ triphosphate (Batts-Young and Lodish 1978), was equally depleted by Treatments A and B, as expected for RNAs with triphosphate groups at their 5’ ends, and was less depleted by Treatment C (Figure 2D). Pol V transcribed RNAs respond similar to the Pol I 45S pre-rRNA control, being equally depleted by Treatments A and B, and less depleted by Treatment C (Figure 2D).…”
Section: P4r2 and Pol V Transcript Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…These predictions hold true for actin and tubulin (ACT2 and TUB8) mRNA controls, transcribed by Pol II, which were significantly more depleted by Treatment A than by Treatments B or C, consistent with these mRNAs bearing 7-methylG caps (Figure 2D). By contrast, a Pol I-transcribed control transcript, 45S pre-rRNA, which is expected to have a 5’ triphosphate (Batts-Young and Lodish 1978), was equally depleted by Treatments A and B, as expected for RNAs with triphosphate groups at their 5’ ends, and was less depleted by Treatment C (Figure 2D). Pol V transcribed RNAs respond similar to the Pol I 45S pre-rRNA control, being equally depleted by Treatments A and B, and less depleted by Treatment C (Figure 2D).…”
Section: P4r2 and Pol V Transcript Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…To confirm the assignment of pppA-Up to product X we applied digestion with endonuclease P 1,We expect as digestion products pppA, pU 1* and P. and indeed all three products are found after electrophoresis on Analysis of the oligonucleotide corresponding to spot X in Fig. 1 coelectrophoresed as well and the spot close to the origin has an electrophoretic mobility, which may be expected for pppAp (1). This set of data shows that product X has the sequence pppA-Up.…”
Section: Analysis Of the 5' Terminus Of 37s Rnamentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In higher eukaryotes, 5S and 45S rDNAs usually have separate chromosomal loci (Castilho & Heslop‐Harrison, 1995; Benabdelmouna & Abirached‐Darmency, 1997; D'Hont et al ., 1998; Benabdelmouna, Abirached‐Darmency & Darmency, 2001), and are transcribed by the RNA polymerases III and I, respectively (Srivastava & Schlessinger, 1991). The localization of 5S and 45S rDNAs within the same repeat occurs only rarely in eukaryotes, and seems to be confined to ‘lower’ eukaryote groups, such as some protozoa, ‘fungi’, and cryptophytes (Srivastava & Schlessinger, 1991; Belkhiri, Buchko & Klassen, 1992); however, 5S and 45S rDNAs are seemingly not transcribed together in these organisms (Batts‐Young & Lodish, 1978). The most striking exception in eukaryotes is the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha , in which the 18S, 5.8S, 26S, and 5S rDNAs are located within the same repeat according to DNA sequence analyses (Sone et al ., 1999), but the mechanism of transcription is not known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%