Triple Helix Model of Innovation and the Politics of Genetically Modified Crops: Cases of Bt Cotton and Bt Brinjal in India

Kumari, Madhulika; Mallick, Sambit

doi:10.1163/15691497-12341443

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nordic countries (Solesvik 2017), Germany (Kreusel, Roth, & Brem 2018), Japan (Yoda & Kuwashima 2019) and Korea (Jungwon Yoon & Han Woo Park 2017), brics countries (Daniels, Ustyuzhantseva, & Yao 2017), i.e. Brazil (Almeida, 2005;Pique, Miralles, Teixeira, & Gaspar 2019), Russia (Balzer & Askonas 2016), India (Kumari & Mallick, 2017), China (C. Liu & Cai 2018) and South Africa (Patra & Muchie 2018), and many developing countries across continents (Hladchenko & Pinheiro 2019;Mêgnigbêto;Saad, Datta, & Razak 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Triple Helix of university-industry-government interactions, highlighting the enhanced role of the university in the transition from industrial to knowledge-based society, has become widespread in innovation and entrepreneurship studies. We analyze classic literature and recent research, shedding light on the theoretical development of a model that has engendered controversy for being simultaneously analytical and normative, theoretical, practical and policy-relevant. We identify lacunae and suggest future analytical trajectories for theoretical development of the Triple Helix model. The explanatory power of Triple Helix has been strengthened by integrating various social science concepts, e.g. Simmel’s triad, Schumpeter’s organizational entrepreneur, institutional logics and social networks, into its framework. As scholars and practitioners from various disciplinary and inter-disciplinary research fields, e.g. artificial intelligence, political theory, sociology, professional ethics, higher education, regional geography and organizational behavior join Triple Helix studies or find their perspectives integrated, new directions appear for Triple Helix research.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With most countries trying to reach this state" (Kumari & Mallick, 2017). This research investigates the significance and value of creating educational summer opportunities for Chinese students as a means of proposing meaningful educational venues in the realm of higher education in China and beyond.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Applying the Triple Helix Model (THM) can best understand these issues. THM "dwells upon the institutional perspective of private and public control at the government, academia, and industry level, enabling various degrees of selective mutual reconciliation (Etzkowitz & Zhou, 2017;Jam, Singh, Ng, & Aziz, 2018;Kumari & Mallick, 2017;Leydesdorff & Etzkowitz, 1998;Leydesdorff & Sun, 2009). Triple Helix I demonstrates that the government directs the relationship between academia and industry by presenting innovative ways of collaboration between the three spheres.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Triple Helix I demonstrates that the government directs the relationship between academia and industry by presenting innovative ways of collaboration between the three spheres. At the same time, Triple Helix II recognizes that "the government has a limited role where both academia and industry perform their functions with limited interaction with the other spheres" (Kumari & Mallick, 2017). However, Triple Helix III emphasizes networking between these three actors (government, academia, and industry), where one takes the role of leading the others in a hybrid organization (Kumari & Mallick, 2017).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A triple helix case: Innovative and sustainable international summer school in China

Al-Obaidi¹,

Yu²

2022

j. adv. res. s. sci. hum.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This paper investigates the International summer School model in China with two objectives: evaluating the curriculum and its features and analyzing the application of the Triple Helix Theory of Innovation. A survey of students in the UnivPlus-BSU Shanghai Program and UnivPlus-FSU Beijing Program was conducted in the summer of 2019. Methodology: A survey of 13 questions was disseminated to 115 students from BSU (Shanghai) and FSU (Beijing). The authors collected instructional data from students and faculty involved in the summer programs. The survey was answered on a volunteer basis and was uneven in number on each campus. Findings: UnivPlus is one of the successful organizations that operate international summer schools in China for Chinese overseas students who are enrolled at U.S. and Canadian universities and take advantage of their home vacations in China to study and earn transfer credits. The Triple Helix Model of innovation refers to interactions between university, industry/business, and government fostering economic and social development. International summer schools in China are a new phenomenon and a good example of the Triple Helix innovation Model. The paper's findings indicate a positive relationship between the collaboration of institutions in the U.S., China, and Canada, effective time management, motivations, and qualitative faculty support for students. Our findings reflect the inspiration of all parties to increase innovation and competitiveness in academia to benefit student learning and enhance their knowledge and intercultural competencies. Implications/Novel Contribution: The success of this program encourages academic leaders at BSU to the potential implementation of summer programs in Japan and Jordan. The international summer program offers Chinese students opportunities to complete some of their courses while visiting their families in the summer with the assurance to transfer credits for equivalent courses at their home universities. This approval process is comparatively easy and unquestionable.

show abstract

“…Apart from being an integral policy making tool for increasing innovation and promoting economic development (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 1997), measuring the role and interaction of research at universities or other R&D institutions with industry, as well as the interaction of government policies in developing a knowledge-based economy (Etzkowitz, 2008) and policy makers in contexts other than innovation (Saad & Zawdie, 2011). Innovation policy and practice researches apply triple helix collaboration in many countries or regions to analyze innovation policies and policy recommendations, such as in the Nordic countries (Solesvik, 2017), Germany (Kreusel et al, 2018), Japan (Yoda & Kuwashima, 2020), South Korea (Yoon & Park, 2017), India (Kumari & Mallick, 2017), China (C. Liu & Cai, 2018). Triple helix collaboration consists of three main aspects: components, relationships between components, and system functions.…”

Section: Many Scholars Have Widely Applied Triplementioning

confidence: 99%

Triple Helix Collaboration in Indonesia’s Covid-19 Vaccine Development: Understanding The Barriers and Enablers

Jatraningrum¹,

Jati²,

Maludin³

et al. 2021

STIPM Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>The development of the Covid-19 vaccine (nationally named Merah Putih Vaccine) is a national innovation activity initiated by the Indonesian central government and coordinated by the National Research and Innovation Agency. This study aims to understand the collaboration between the triple helix components (Industry, Academician, and Government) in the Merah Putih vaccine (MP vaccine). An exploratory study of the actors involved in developing the MP vaccine was carried out through a primary data collection process from January to August 2021. Furthermore, a descriptive analysis of triple helix collaboration discloses components, functions, and configuration in the MP vaccine development. Our finding reveals that the most highlighted issue is the reputation concerning two significant dimensions; scientists' experience or R&D human resources on real-life projects and the R&D facilities and infrastructure. However, neither of the dimensions can accelerate the proof-of-concept vaccine candidate immediately. The critical findings of this research serve as empirical evidence of the barriers and enablers of a national innovation project initiated by the government, as seen from the triple helix collaboration with the emerging issues approach</p><p>Keywords: Triple Helix Collaboration, Covid-19, Emerging Issue, Vaccine</p>

show abstract

Triple Helix Model of Innovation and the Politics of Genetically Modified Crops: Cases of Bt Cotton and Bt Brinjal in India

Cited by 5 publications

References 12 publications

Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future

Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future

A triple helix case: Innovative and sustainable international summer school in China

Triple Helix Collaboration in Indonesia’s Covid-19 Vaccine Development: Understanding The Barriers and Enablers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About