2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple-Internal Standard Based Glycan Structural Assignment Method for Capillary Electrophoresis Analysis of Carbohydrates

Abstract: Despite the ever growing use of capillary electrophoresis in biomedical research and the biopharmaceutical industry, the development of data interpretation methods is lagging behind. In this paper we report the design and implementation of a coinjected triple-internal standard method to alleviate the need of an accompanying run of the maltooligosaccharide ladder for glucose unit (GU) calculation. Based on the migration times of the coinjected standards of maltose, maltotriose, and maltopentadecaose (bracketing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, Trace A, featuring 14 peaks of interest (peak area ࣙ1%) including multisialo (1-4), monosialo (5)(6)(7)(8), and neutral glycans (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Structural elucidation of these carbohydrates were based on their calculated GU values following the triple internal standard approach of Jarvas et al [32] in conjunction with searching the NIBRT database (https://glycobase.nibrt.ie) and also on previously published literature data [33]. In cases of any ambiguities, exoglycosidase-based carbohydrate sequencing was applied (data not shown).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Serum N-glycome Profile Between The Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, Trace A, featuring 14 peaks of interest (peak area ࣙ1%) including multisialo (1-4), monosialo (5)(6)(7)(8), and neutral glycans (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Structural elucidation of these carbohydrates were based on their calculated GU values following the triple internal standard approach of Jarvas et al [32] in conjunction with searching the NIBRT database (https://glycobase.nibrt.ie) and also on previously published literature data [33]. In cases of any ambiguities, exoglycosidase-based carbohydrate sequencing was applied (data not shown).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Serum N-glycome Profile Between The Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 85 Traditionally, a complete glycan ladder is used to estimate the relative size of the sample using the migration time of the standard oligomer and the analytes to address an experimentally observed change in ladder migration associated with a helical turn that occurs in maltooligosaccharide structures above a degree of polymerization of 7. 85 However, as shown in Figure 6 , the approach is simplified to only three co-injected size standards to accurately index migration time without the drawbacks of ladder and sample overlap due to comigration. 85 Additionally, one standard also serves to normalize variations in the sample injection.…”
Section: Methods To Identify Glycansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representative electropherogram of maltooligomers in the lower trace is aligned with DP2, DP3, and DP15 in the upper panel. Reprinted with permission from ref ( 85 ). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Methods To Identify Glycansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The migration and/or retention time of each point of the profile is converted to glucose units (GU) using a glucose homo-oligomer ladder injected prior and after the samples. A virtual ladder, by using the recently introduced triple internal standard approach, is also appropriate for GU value calculation [76]. The electropherogram and/or chromatogram is than fractionally divided into different GU value sections, based on the major oligosaccharide classes in the profile (neutral, sialylated, HM, and hybrid).…”
Section: Introducing the Glycosimilarity Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%