2011
DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x11006364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple Threat Trauma: Evidence-Based Mental Health Response for the 2011 Japan Disaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TSIG summary table illustrates that internal displacement generates a confluence of major psychological risk factors that, singly and collectively, carry a high risk for psychopathology. The elements of (1) decades-long duration, (2) ever-enlarging numbers of persons affected, and (3) intentional human causation differentiate forced migration in Colombia from TSIG case studies of natural, hybrid, and non-intentional technological disasters previously performed [3341]. These features also contribute to the finding that most psychological risk factors appearing in Table 5 are rated as either “very severe” or “extreme.”…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The TSIG summary table illustrates that internal displacement generates a confluence of major psychological risk factors that, singly and collectively, carry a high risk for psychopathology. The elements of (1) decades-long duration, (2) ever-enlarging numbers of persons affected, and (3) intentional human causation differentiate forced migration in Colombia from TSIG case studies of natural, hybrid, and non-intentional technological disasters previously performed [3341]. These features also contribute to the finding that most psychological risk factors appearing in Table 5 are rated as either “very severe” or “extreme.”…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Consistent with the Disaster Ecology Model [2932], TSIG analysis advances the position that this singular “signature” of exposure risks is a predictor of the psychosocial and mental health consequences sustained by Colombian IDPs. Internal displacement in Colombia provides the context for extending TSIG applications from catastrophic natural disasters [33–38], human-generated (anthropogenic) technological disasters [39], and “hybrid” disasters (featuring both prominent natural and anthropogenic elements) [40, 41], to the realm of intentional, perpetrated acts of violence [42] and armed conflict situations that can evolve into complex emergencies [1••, 43–45]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trauma signature (TSIG) analysis [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] was applied to examine the psychological and mental health effects of Hurricane Matthew. TSIG analysis is defined as "an evidence-based method that examines the interrelationship between population exposure to a disaster, extreme event, or complex emergency; and the inter-related physical and psychological consequences; for the purpose of providing timely, actionable guidance for effective disaster behavioral health (DBH) support that is tailored to the defining features of the event."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TSIG analyses have been conducted across a spectrum of disasters, both natural and anthropogenic. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] In the depiction of Hurricane Matthew, TSIG analyses are applied to illuminate the manner in which the physical forces of harm associated with this tropical cyclone were tranmuted into psychological outcomes.…”
Section: Disaster Ecology Model and Trauma Signature (Tsig) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal MHPSS response 1 , 2 that incorporates TSIG analysis can be summarized as a sequence of six steps (see also Figure 1): 1) initial TSIG analysis to guide response based on the defining features of the disaster or potentially-traumatizing event (PTE), 2) TSIG-guided preparation of responders for what to expect and deployment of appropriate response assets, 3) delivery and evaluation of evidence-informed early interventions, 4) implementation of onsite validated disaster behavioral health needs assessment, 5) identification and intervention with individuals at high risk for disaster-related psychological distress, impairment, or psychopathology, and 6) continuous monitoring of responder and survivor mental health throughout recovery with comprehensive (“end-to-end”) evaluation of the MHPSS response.…”
Section: Tsig Analysis In the Context Of Evidence-based Mhpss Disastementioning
confidence: 99%