“…In comparison to direct formation of CPDs by UV irradiation, the relative yield of TT versus C-containing CPDs formed by photosensitization with acetone (≤79%) and NFX (>90%) was much higher than that for NB UVB (31%), and consistent with previous studies with sensitizers ( 41 , 53 , 56 ). The low fraction of C-containing CPDs has traditionally been explained by the fact that T has a lower triplet energy than C, and that triplet states will either preferentially form at, or migrate to, a T. This difference alone, however, would not readily explain why CPDs can’t also form at TC and CT sites which also contain a T. Recent time-resolved studies of CPD formation upon triplet sensitization of T in TT, TC and CT found that the quantum yield is 2–3 less for TC and CT formation than for TT formation, presumably reflecting the relative stability of the biradical intermediates (Figure 2B ) ( 51 ). While this would explain why TT CPDs are formed in higher yield than TC and CT CPDs, it does not explain why the TT/(TC + CT) ratio depends on the triplet energy of the sensitizer, unless the reaction can also proceed through the triplet state of C. Acetone has a triplet state energy of ≈340 kJ/mol ( 52 ) that is higher than that for both T and C, whereas NFX has a much lower energy triplet of ≈270 kJ/mol that can only sensitize T ( 46 , 49 ).…”