1980
DOI: 10.1021/ja00540a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triplet methylnitrene: an indefinitely stable species in the absence of collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the authors of this study suggested that lowering of the symmetry of the system and a more accurate account of the electronic correlation would lead to the disappearance of the barrier in accordance with the results of earlier calculations. 85,86 In 2000, a new attempt was made 93 to establish the presence of a barrier between the positions 1 [CH 3 N] and H 2 C = NH on the PES. The calculations were carried out by the CASSCF(12/11) and CASPT2 methods with the cc-pVDZ and cc-pVTZ basis sets.…”
Section: -Azidonorbornanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the authors of this study suggested that lowering of the symmetry of the system and a more accurate account of the electronic correlation would lead to the disappearance of the barrier in accordance with the results of earlier calculations. 85,86 In 2000, a new attempt was made 93 to establish the presence of a barrier between the positions 1 [CH 3 N] and H 2 C = NH on the PES. The calculations were carried out by the CASSCF(12/11) and CASPT2 methods with the cc-pVDZ and cc-pVTZ basis sets.…”
Section: -Azidonorbornanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several computational studies of the dissociation of methyl azide, 15,18,[34][35][36] including the MNDO study by Bock and Dammel mentioned above. 31 Nguyen et al studied the potential energy surfaces at the UMP2 / 6-31G͑d , p͒ level of theory and computed the rate constants for the decomposition of methyl azide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-2AK(;, + U(~2 -2/3) + Eaan + 1I2(E bb + Ecc)(2 _ ~2) + (A-B)K2+B[J(J+ 1) -2(K+~)~+2] -DKK4 -DNK [J(J + 1) -2(K + ~)~ + 2]K 2 -DN[(J(J+ 1)2-4~KJ(J+ 1) + (8-6~2)J(J+ 1) -(4 -6~2)K2 -2~K + 4(1 _ ~2)],where and (;, == «(; ILz + Gz 1(;)· Spin-uncoupling(JK,P + 1,~ + 1; ± IH IJKP~; ± ) = -[B-2DN[J(J+ 1) +K-1-2~] -DNKK2 -(Ebb + Ecc )/4] X [2J(J + 1) -2(K + ~)(K + ~ + 1)]112, (JK,P + 2,~ + 2; ± IH IJKP~; ± ) = -2D N [J(J+ 1) -K(K-1)]1I2[J(J+ 1) _ K(K + 1)] 1/2. Elements off-diagonal in K (J, -K + 2, -P+ 2, -~; ± IH'IJKP~; ±) ± (-I)J-K+ Ihl [J(J + 1) -(K + ~ -1)(K + ~ -2)]1/2[J(J + 1) -(K + ~)(K + ~ _1)]1/2, (J, -K + 2, -P+ 1, -~ -1; ± IH'IJKP~; ±) = ± (_l)J-K+ I(EI -2h l ) X [2J(J + 1) -2(K + ~)(K + ~ _1)]112, (J, -K + 2, -P, -~-2; ± IH'IJKP~; ±) = ±(_I)J-K+12(01+h l -E I ), (J, -K -1, -P-l, -~; ± IH'IJKP~; ±) = ± ( -I)J -K [h2 (2K + 1) + 2E2b~] X [J(J + 1) -(K + ~)(K + ~ + 1)]112, (J, -K -1, -P, -~ + 1; ± IH'IJKP~; ± ) ± ( -1)J-K [(E 2a -h2 )(2K + 1) + (02 -E 2b )(2~ -1)](2) 112.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%