1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1984.tb00787.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triploidy, partial mole and dispermy. An investigation of 12 cases

Abstract: Twelve triploid abortuses were investigated to determine the origin of the additional haploid set and were retrospectively examined for the development of partial hydatidiform mole. Eight out of ten suitable triploids were diagnosed as partial mole. Dispermy was indicated as the cause of triploidy in 6 informative cases of which 3 were also partial moles. However, one diandric triploid had no features of partial mole. The problem of maternal cell contamination in triploids and the difficulty of diagnosing part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three studies with the largest sample size may be the least biased, as their samples were collected from series of consecutive abortions (Boué & Boué, ; Jacobs et al, ; Warburton, Byrne, & Canki, ). However, though the frequency values reported by Jacobs et al () (7.07%) and Warburton et al () (5.61%) were similar to those reported in smaller studies (4.5%) (Carr, ) and (7.32%) (Procter, Gray, & Watt, ), the frequency reported by Boué and Boué () (12.22%) was significantly higher, most likely due to the inclusion of earlier gestational losses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The three studies with the largest sample size may be the least biased, as their samples were collected from series of consecutive abortions (Boué & Boué, ; Jacobs et al, ; Warburton, Byrne, & Canki, ). However, though the frequency values reported by Jacobs et al () (7.07%) and Warburton et al () (5.61%) were similar to those reported in smaller studies (4.5%) (Carr, ) and (7.32%) (Procter, Gray, & Watt, ), the frequency reported by Boué and Boué () (12.22%) was significantly higher, most likely due to the inclusion of earlier gestational losses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%