2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.02.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRIPOLI-4® Monte Carlo code ITER A-lite neutronic model validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be ob tained that Dk eff = -0.024 % and s = = 0.016 %. The Dk eff re sult was within a ± 3s in ter val [25], which proves the ac cu racy of the SuperMC-OTF. To fur ther eval u ate the per for mance of SuperMC-OTF, the cal cu la tion times with the two meth ods are pro vided in tab.…”
Section: Ef Fec Tive Mul Ti Pli Ca Tion Fac Torsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be ob tained that Dk eff = -0.024 % and s = = 0.016 %. The Dk eff re sult was within a ± 3s in ter val [25], which proves the ac cu racy of the SuperMC-OTF. To fur ther eval u ate the per for mance of SuperMC-OTF, the cal cu la tion times with the two meth ods are pro vided in tab.…”
Section: Ef Fec Tive Mul Ti Pli Ca Tion Fac Torsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The k eff per for mance is af fected (more or less) by frac tions of key nuclides in the core re gion [27]. Some stud ies have in ves ti gated the re la tion ship be tween k eff and 208 Pb [25,26] in cool ant. Higher 15 N en rich ment of nitride fuel ma te rial has been ap plied to RBEC-M reac tors to im prove k eff per for mance.…”
Section: Ef Fec Tive Mul Ti Pli Ca Tion Fac Tormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A huge effort of code and nuclear data verification was carried out to ensure energy balance coherence (comparison with NJOY HEATR module). In recent benchmark comparisons, between MCNP5 & TRIPOLI-4 ® , a good agreement is noticed for NH calculation: DEMO generic model [15] and ITER A-lite [10].…”
Section: Nuclear Heatingmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The nuclear analysis of DEMO HCLL carried out at ENEA [9] is compared to the CEA one. This comparison is not a rigorous benchmark between TRIPOLI-4 ® and MCNP5 since the nuclear data are different, this kind of exercise have been done for ITER [10]. This paper presents the comparison of relevant nuclear responses: neutron wall loading, tritium breeding ratio, nuclear heating, neutron flux distribution, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both MCAM and McCad provide the capability to generate a TRIPOLI-4 geometry input file from CAD file. MCAM was successfully tested on the ITER geometry [11] and was used to convert MCNP ITER A-lite model to the TRIPOLI syntax. In this work the TRIPOLI input file produced by McCad was tested.…”
Section: Tripoli-4mentioning
confidence: 99%