2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

trips4health: Protocol of a single-blinded randomised controlled trial incentivising adults to use public transport for physical activity gain

Abstract: Background Public transport (PT) users typically accumulate more physical activity (PA) than private motor vehicle users yet redressing physical inactivity through transport-related PA (TRPA) interventions has received limited attention. Further, incentive-based strategies can increase leisure-time PA but their impact on TRPA, is unclear. This study's objective is to determine the impact of an incentive-based strategy on TRPA in a regional Australian setting. Methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall 464 unique articles were identified once 14 duplicates were removed. Two reviewers completed title and abstract screening identifiying 29 for full-text screening; of these, 21 met our criteria, 8 are ongoing studies,56–63 8 are completed trials where a process evaluation was conducted but results are not available,64–71 and 5 are completed studies with process evaluation results available 72–76. As with the studies that were synthesised in our review, these included participants from a range of different ages and health conditions for example, insomnia disorder, diabetes, heart disease, hip fracture and obesity and generally focused on increasing physical activity, reducing sedentary behaviour or were lifestyle or weight loss interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall 464 unique articles were identified once 14 duplicates were removed. Two reviewers completed title and abstract screening identifiying 29 for full-text screening; of these, 21 met our criteria, 8 are ongoing studies,56–63 8 are completed trials where a process evaluation was conducted but results are not available,64–71 and 5 are completed studies with process evaluation results available 72–76. As with the studies that were synthesised in our review, these included participants from a range of different ages and health conditions for example, insomnia disorder, diabetes, heart disease, hip fracture and obesity and generally focused on increasing physical activity, reducing sedentary behaviour or were lifestyle or weight loss interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trips4health study was a single-blinded RCT involving adults undertaking infrequent public transport use (≤ 2 trips per week) in the state capital (greater Hobart region) of Tasmania, Australia [ 15 ]. Within this region, public transport was comprised of only bus services, predominantly offered by one provider, Metro Tasmania Pty.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an incentive-based intervention, the trips4health study provided an immediate reward (financial gain) as a motivator for the uptake of public transport usage. The study protocol [ 15 ], acceptability and feasibility [ 16 ], and positive impact on bus use in the control vs intervention group [ 17 ] has been described in detail elsewhere; process evaluation findings indicated that the trips4health study demonstrated strong fidelity, feasibility, and acceptability [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of trips4health are outlined in the protocol [ 15 ] and are summarised here. trips4health was a RCT with a 16-week intervention phase and a 6-month follow-up phase targeting infrequent adult bus users.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruitment was through social and local radio and printed media, on-bus and bus exchange advertising, concurrent University of Tasmania travel survey and staff intranet, newsletters of relevant organisation such as state government, and personal and professional networks of the project team. Potential trips4health participants were screened for eligibility via an online or telephone questionnaire (Additional File Table A1 ) [ 15 ]. Key eligibility criteria included residing in the Greater Hobart area, being an adult (age ≥ 18 years), using the bus less than or equal to two trips per week in the past 6 months, and possessing or willingness to obtain a travel smartcard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%