2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01064.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triptans vs Other Drugs for Acute Migraine. Are There Differences in Efficacy? A Comment

Abstract: The introduction of triptans in migraine treatment was apparently a revolution. Comparative randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with triptan and other drugs do not give a clear-cut picture. Oral triptans are superior to oral ergotamine most likely because the bioavailability oral of ergotamine is extremely low (<1%). Compared with NSAIDs, in most cases aspirin, triptans were not superior and in several RCTs triptans caused more adverse events than aspirin plus metoclopramide. Guidelines for treatment of migraine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these situations, Triptans: low utilization and high turnover 5 patients prefer other medications such as OTC drugs or NSAIDs. Although triptans are undoubtedly very efficacious for migraine attacks, a clear superiority over NSAIDs in comparative studies did not appear on the primary end-point (8,30,31). A recent study has also reported a superiority of an OTC drug in comparison with sumatriptan (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In these situations, Triptans: low utilization and high turnover 5 patients prefer other medications such as OTC drugs or NSAIDs. Although triptans are undoubtedly very efficacious for migraine attacks, a clear superiority over NSAIDs in comparative studies did not appear on the primary end-point (8,30,31). A recent study has also reported a superiority of an OTC drug in comparison with sumatriptan (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We focused on inflammatory genes because anti-inflammatory drugs are effective in treating migraine 21, 22 , and in mildly delaying the progression from episodic to chronic headaches 23, 24 . We focused on the calvarial periosteum because it is the tissue to which pericranial and neck muscles are inserted to, because muscle neck aches can originate in their tendons 25, 26 , and because it is commonly included in the perception of imploding headache.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in a systematic review of triptans [3n] the mean therapeutic gain (active minus placebo) for headache relief at 2 h was 19% (95% CI 16–22%) for frovatriptan 2.5 mg, whereas it was 33% (95% CI 31–35%) for sumatriptan 100 mg, 34% (95% CI 30–37%) for zolmitriptan 2.5 mg, 36% (95% CI 32–39%) for rizatriptan 10 mg, and 27% (95% CI 20–33%) for almotriptan 12.5 mg. The superiority of sumatriptan 100 mg versus frovatriptan 2.5 mg was confirmed in a not fully published large ( n  = 1196) RCT in which the headache relief rates were 47 and 37%, respectively [4, 5]. The recurrences rates for frovatriptan (25%) and sumatriptan (31%) were similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%