1996
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270195017057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tris(1,10-phenanthroline)ruthenium(II) Bis(hexafluorophosphate)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
32
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
8
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the spatial restraints imposed by the coordination, ''πϪπ interactions'' are frequently observed in crystal structures of neutral {[Ru(bpy) 3 ] [50] } and, more surprisingly, charged propeller-shaped molecules of the type investigated here {[Ru(bpym) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 ·CH 3 CN, [15] [Ru(phen) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 [13] }. The ''coordination'' of the cations by anions is quite similar in both the γ-and β-type structures.…”
Section: Comparison Of Crystal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the spatial restraints imposed by the coordination, ''πϪπ interactions'' are frequently observed in crystal structures of neutral {[Ru(bpy) 3 ] [50] } and, more surprisingly, charged propeller-shaped molecules of the type investigated here {[Ru(bpym) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 ·CH 3 CN, [15] [Ru(phen) 3 ](PF 6 ) 2 [13] }. The ''coordination'' of the cations by anions is quite similar in both the γ-and β-type structures.…”
Section: Comparison Of Crystal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller the kink and the trigonal twist, the ''taller'' the complex Figure 6. Labelling scheme of the geometrical parameters listed in Tables 3 and 4 Table 4 [a] 78.41 (15) 78.82 (12) 78.50 (16) 76.41(11) 79.14 (12) 78.68 (13) 78.64 (14) 76.15 (11) [°] [a] 89.13 (10) 89.51 (9) 92.12 (16) 90.6(1) 92.53 (14) 92.43 (16) 94.80(14) 91.40 (12) 93.04 (12) 93.09 (14) 95.92 (11) [a] For labelling scheme, see Figure 6. 2 .…”
Section: Comparison Of Molecular Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ORTEP drawing of the cation with the atomic numbering scheme is depicted in Figure 1. Crystal data, selected bond lengths, and bond angles are collected in Table 4 [8] and comparable to those found for [Ru(dmp) 2 (fpp)] 2+ (2.088 Å). [9] The dihedral angle between the two dmp planes is 67.6°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The bidentate phen ligand coordinates to the Ru atom with Ru--N distances of 2.117 (2) and 2.128 (2) A. These bonds are significantly longer than the corresponding Ru--Nphen bond lengths in the literature, for example, 2.056 (8) and 2.082 (9)A, for [Ru(bipy)2-(phen)] 2+ (Ye et al, 1995), where bipy is 2,2t-bipyridine, 2.096 (5)-2.100 (5) A for [Ru(phen)2(py)2] 2÷ (Bonneson et al, 1983), where py is pyridine, and an average of 2.063 (4) A, for [Ru(phen)3] 2+ (Breu & Stoll, 1996)…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%