2002
DOI: 10.1515/sosys-2002-0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tristes Tropiques. Systems Theory and the Literary Scene

Abstract: In Niklas Luhmann’s later works on social exclusion, his concept of environment is no longer strictly epistemological but becomes increasingly ethnographic. From a systems theoretical point of view, environments are mere effects of social systems and their need to distinguish constantly between essential operations and operations that are of no consequence for the continuous reproduction of the systems’ identities. However, under certain circumstances environments turn out to be spatial. One could even say tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it has been argued that Luhmann's analysis of functional differentiation can be brought into productive dialogue with postcolonial studies (Eckstein and Reinfandt, 2016). On the other hand, Luhmann's account is clearly Eurocentric, to the degree that ways of life unfolding far from Europe are hardly recognisable to him and likened instead to mere bodily survival (see also Balke, 2002;Eckstein and Reinfandt, 2016). In other words, despite possibly constituting the most emphatic part of Luhmann's work, his analysis of areas of exclusion is founded on a distinction between 'us' and 'them', modernity and its flipside, portraying 'the other' in fearful terms, thereby invoking all those tropes postcolonial scholars have rightly criticised.…”
Section: Luhmann's Dehumanised Sociologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it has been argued that Luhmann's analysis of functional differentiation can be brought into productive dialogue with postcolonial studies (Eckstein and Reinfandt, 2016). On the other hand, Luhmann's account is clearly Eurocentric, to the degree that ways of life unfolding far from Europe are hardly recognisable to him and likened instead to mere bodily survival (see also Balke, 2002;Eckstein and Reinfandt, 2016). In other words, despite possibly constituting the most emphatic part of Luhmann's work, his analysis of areas of exclusion is founded on a distinction between 'us' and 'them', modernity and its flipside, portraying 'the other' in fearful terms, thereby invoking all those tropes postcolonial scholars have rightly criticised.…”
Section: Luhmann's Dehumanised Sociologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She recognizes further that the theme "inclusion/exclusion" began only in the early 90ies to question, inside Luhmann's theory, the primacy of functional differentiation. See alsoLUHMANN (1995c),BALKE (2002),NASSEHI (2012, pp. 404-405).13 Such statement should be read cum grano salis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este texto parte também de análise de favelas sulamericanas. Balke (2002, p 33 e ss) compara a observação exterior de Luhmann, em uma breve visita, àquela que Levi-Strauss relata em seus Tristes Trópicos. A fala de Luhmann é direta e questiona frontalmente a diferenciação funcional da sociedade moderna "Para a surpresa dos bem intencionados, devemos reconhecer que a exclusão ainda existe, e existe em uma escala massiva e em tamanhas formas de miséria que elas estão para além da descrição.…”
Section: Luhmann Afirmaunclassified