“…Nevertheless, as demonstrated by the present example, such bands can be rather prominent in samples of short-length peptides if they are centered in the wavelength regime that do not overlap with the ligand transitions but may also modulate the observed signals at higher energies, i.e., below ∼210 nm. Furthermore, in contrast to the well-defined signs (positive or negative) of the CD signals related to the different secondary structural elements of the peptide backbone, literature data suggests that the LMCT-induced transitions may result in negative or positive signals, depending on the type of ligand, the number/configuration of chirality centers, and their relative positions to the thiolate–metal ion bonds. ,,,, The evolution of the low-energy, CT-related CD bands in the As III - L system at any studied pH (Figures A and S6A,B) and with Hg II at pH 7.5 (Figures B and S6D) provides strong support for the formation of the previously proposed tristhiolate binding mode of L . Indeed, the absence of such features in the Hg II - L sample at pH 2.0 (Figure S6C) is in accord with the higher energy of the LMCT bands in {HgS 2 }-type species, shifting also the related CD signals into the wavelength range of the amide-bond transitions.…”