2015
DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2015.1008914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tristram Hooley, Jane Wellens, and John Marriott, What Is Online Research? Using the Internet for Social Science Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of response appears to reflect others' observation that online group discussions may allow participants more time to formulate contributions that are less spontaneous and more considered (Hooley, Marriott, and Wellens 2012). As such, the detail, specificity, and criticality of some comments served as welcome reminders to us that the themes we had presented did necessarily reflect the full range of issues or concerns felt by learners.…”
Section: Qualitative Datamentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This type of response appears to reflect others' observation that online group discussions may allow participants more time to formulate contributions that are less spontaneous and more considered (Hooley, Marriott, and Wellens 2012). As such, the detail, specificity, and criticality of some comments served as welcome reminders to us that the themes we had presented did necessarily reflect the full range of issues or concerns felt by learners.…”
Section: Qualitative Datamentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In the case of asynchronous online focus groups, where discussion takes place over a period of days, months, or even years, participants may also be afforded more time to reflect on and formulate responses than would be the case in conventional focus groups (Lim and Tan 2001). In turn, conducting group discussions online poses certain challenges, including the absence of non-verbal cues (in the case of text-based discussions), the need for participants to possess a degree of 'digital literacy', and the risk of discussions becoming chaotic without careful moderation (Hooley, Marriott, and Wellens 2012).…”
Section: Online Focus Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is precedence that forums such as the one used in the present study are generally perceived as public by their users (Walther & Boyd, 2002), however the absence of standardised guidance regarding the need to obtain informed consent in these situations is debated by researchers (e.g. Hooley, Wellens, & Marriott, 2012). University research ethics committee (REC) approval was sought and obtained before commencing data collection.…”
Section: Methods Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%