1976
DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930080212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tritiated thymidine labeling index of benign and malignant human breast epithelium

Abstract: 38 specimens of benign breast tissue from young women and 92 primary breast carcinomas were evaluated for tritiated thymidine ([3H]TdR) labeling index (TLI) by in vitro pulse labeling. The TLI on nonneoplastic, terminal breast ducts was significantly higher during the latter half than during the first half of the menstrual cycle (P less than 0.001), and a geometric mean TLI of 1.5 during the latter half of the cycle is consistent with approximately 47% turnover of these cells during the menstrual cycle. Ducts … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the spread of Mi's and Li's amongst leukoplakia speeimens within separate investigations ranged from 2 to >f 0-fold, while the spread of values amongst eontrol tissue from the same studies was only of the order of 2 to 4-fold. Similar high levels in inter-patient variation have been reported for squamous eell carcinoma of the oral cavity (Breseiani et al 1974, Chavaudra et al 1979, basal eell eareinotna (Weinstein & Frost 1970), cervical earcinoma (Dixon et al 1977, Siracky et al 1977, gastric and eolonie carcinoma (Britton et al 1975, Lesher et al f977, Maskens & Deschner 1977) and breast cancer (Meyer & Bauer 1976, Sklarew et al 1977. Sueh wide variation between individuals probably contributes to the failure to deteet signifieant differenees between patient and control groups in some studies.…”
Section: :2 Inter-attd Intra-individual Variationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…For example, the spread of Mi's and Li's amongst leukoplakia speeimens within separate investigations ranged from 2 to >f 0-fold, while the spread of values amongst eontrol tissue from the same studies was only of the order of 2 to 4-fold. Similar high levels in inter-patient variation have been reported for squamous eell carcinoma of the oral cavity (Breseiani et al 1974, Chavaudra et al 1979, basal eell eareinotna (Weinstein & Frost 1970), cervical earcinoma (Dixon et al 1977, Siracky et al 1977, gastric and eolonie carcinoma (Britton et al 1975, Lesher et al f977, Maskens & Deschner 1977) and breast cancer (Meyer & Bauer 1976, Sklarew et al 1977. Sueh wide variation between individuals probably contributes to the failure to deteet signifieant differenees between patient and control groups in some studies.…”
Section: :2 Inter-attd Intra-individual Variationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Reproducibility of DNA labeling has been demonstrated by replicate counting, 49,50 replicate sampling, 49,51 and comparison between primary breast cancer and lymph nodal metastasis. 50 Approximately 25 min is required to count 2000 cells visually.…”
Section: Dna Precursor Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although absolute differences decline with decreasing labeling index, interobserver coefficients of variation increase because of fewer labeled cells counted. 49 Field selection also contributes to interobserver variability. In all, 61% of 65 primary breast cancers were regionally heterogeneous for labeling index by criterion of significantly more intersample variance than intrasample variance.…”
Section: Dna Precursor Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FUdR is known to potentiate the labeling of S-phase cells with 'H-TdR.''." (2)In-depth labeling of the slices was enhanced by use of hyperbaric oxygen during incubation. (3) The resultant high grain counts over labeled nuclei sharply discriminated them from background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%