2018
DOI: 10.3133/sir20185086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tritium deposition in precipitation in the United States, 1953–2012

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to samples of thermal water from the Upper Geyser Basin where tritium concentrations are mostly below the analytical detection limit (Hurwitz, Hunt, et al, 2012). The tritium concentration at the Lewis Lake outlet was 6.0 TU, significantly less than the ~10 TU measured in the Upper Firehole River in 2007 (Hurwitz, Hunt et al, 2012), which is also the expected average concentration of precipitation in the interior United States since the early 2000s (Michel et al, 2018). The tritium concentrations in the springs suggest mixing of “old” thermal water with ~10–35% of recent, nonthermal water at shallow depths (Hurwitz et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to samples of thermal water from the Upper Geyser Basin where tritium concentrations are mostly below the analytical detection limit (Hurwitz, Hunt, et al, 2012). The tritium concentration at the Lewis Lake outlet was 6.0 TU, significantly less than the ~10 TU measured in the Upper Firehole River in 2007 (Hurwitz, Hunt et al, 2012), which is also the expected average concentration of precipitation in the interior United States since the early 2000s (Michel et al, 2018). The tritium concentrations in the springs suggest mixing of “old” thermal water with ~10–35% of recent, nonthermal water at shallow depths (Hurwitz et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems concentration of precipitation in the interior United States since the early 2000s (Michel et al, 2018). The tritium concentrations in the springs suggest mixing of "old" thermal water with~10-35% of recent, nonthermal water at shallow depths (Hurwitz et al, 2010).…”
Section: 1029/2019gc008848mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 H precipitation( t ) is best determined using local precipitation tritium data; unfortunately, such records are rare. Instead, local precipitation tritium time series (i.e., 3 H precipitation(t) ) can be estimated using statistical models (e.g., Doney et al, ; Newman et al, ; Zhang et al, ), interpolations of precipitation tritium data from nearby stations (Jasechko & Taylor, ), and/or extrapolations of local precipitation tritium data through time by comparing local precipitation tritium data to precipitation measurements made at another station with a longer record (e.g., Blavoux et al, ; Michel et al, ).…”
Section: Modern Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age of groundwater was classified as Modern, PreModern, or Mixed based on measurements of tritium ( 3 H) and their relation to the history of 3 H in precipitation [Michel et al 2018], corrected for decay to the time of sampling [Lindsey et al 2019]. Modern groundwater is water that was primarily recharged since 1950 and typically has 3 H above 2 tritium units (TU).…”
Section: Redox Land Use and Age Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%