Advanced Diagnostics for Magnetic and Inertial Fusion 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8696-2_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tritium Issues in Next Step Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to 87% of the codeposited tritium has been thermally desorbed from tile samples from the Joint European Torus (JET) and the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) in laboratory experiments [12]. The technique is attractive for tritium removal in a next-step DT device since it avoids the use of oxidation, the associated deconditioning of the plasma facing surfaces and expense of processing large quantities of tritium oxide [13,14]. Although designed for tritium removal, this approach offers an opportunity to study in microscopic detail the thermomechanical response of tokamak generated codeposits to transient high heat fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to 87% of the codeposited tritium has been thermally desorbed from tile samples from the Joint European Torus (JET) and the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) in laboratory experiments [12]. The technique is attractive for tritium removal in a next-step DT device since it avoids the use of oxidation, the associated deconditioning of the plasma facing surfaces and expense of processing large quantities of tritium oxide [13,14]. Although designed for tritium removal, this approach offers an opportunity to study in microscopic detail the thermomechanical response of tokamak generated codeposits to transient high heat fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to 87% of the codeposited tritium has been thermally desorbed from tile samples from the Joint European Torus (JET) and the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) in laboratory experiments [12]. The technique is attractive for tritium removal in a next-step DT device since it avoids the use of oxidation, the associated deconditioning of the plasma facing surfaces and expense of processing large quantities of tritium oxide [13,14]. Although designed for tritium removal, this approach offers an opportunity to study in microscopic detail the thermomechanical response of tokamak generated codeposits to transient high heat fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival of plasma facing materials under ELMs, disruptions and vertical displacement events (VDEs), and the control of the tritium inventory are related challenges that must be met for magnetic fusion to achieve its promise as an attractive, environmentally acceptable energy source [2]. Carbon based materials have superior thermomechanical properties and do not melt (they sublime), however they cause high levels of tritium retention by codeposition with eroded carbon that would severely curtail plasma operations [3,4] in a next-step device with carbon plasma facing components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%