2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2009.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trivial extensions defined by Prüfer conditions

Abstract: Communicated by A.V. Geramita MSC: 13F05 13B05 13A15 13D05 13B25 a b s t r a c t This paper deals with well-known extensions of the Prüfer domain concept to arbitrary commutative rings. We investigate the transfer of these notions in trivial ring extensions (also called idealizations) of commutative rings by modules and then generate original families of rings with zero-divisors subject to various Prüfer conditions. The new examples give further evidence for the validity of the Bazzoni-Glaz conjecture on the w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let K be a field and set A := K (3) , B := K (2) , and J := {0} × K , where K (n) is the direct product ring K × K × · · · × K (n-times). If f is the projection defined by (a, b, c) → (a, b), it is immediately seen that A f J ∼ = K (4) . Then Tot(A f J) ∼ = K (4) , but Tot(A) × Tot(B) ∼ = K (5) .…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let K be a field and set A := K (3) , B := K (2) , and J := {0} × K , where K (n) is the direct product ring K × K × · · · × K (n-times). If f is the projection defined by (a, b, c) → (a, b), it is immediately seen that A f J ∼ = K (4) . Then Tot(A f J) ∼ = K (4) , but Tot(A) × Tot(B) ∼ = K (5) .…”
Section: Remark 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, progress has been made in solving this conjecture under some restrictions on the ring R. Lucas (2008 [43]) provided an answer when the ring is reduced: Bakkari, Kabbaj and Mahdou (2010 [5]) investigated Kaplansky's Conjecture for trivial ring extensions. Let A be a ring and let E be an A module.…”
Section: Theorem 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bakkari, Kabbaj and Mahdou [5] called a ring over which every Gaussian polynomial has locally principal content ideal, a pseudo-arithmetical ring. It will be interesting to characterize pseudo-arithmetical rings, and also to clarify the situation for general rings, namely:…”
Section: Be the Trivial Ring Extension Of A Domain A By Its Field Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13] C. U. Jensen gives some more characterization of arithmetical ring, and it is proved that a ring A is an arithmetical ring if and only if every localization A at a maximal (prime) ideal is a valuation ring. See for instance [1,2,5,6,8,9,13]. Let A be a ring, E be an A-module, and R = A ∝ E be the set of pairs a e with pairwise addition and multiplication given by a e b f = ab af + be .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have proven to be useful in solving ON VALUATION RINGS 177 many open problems and conjectures for various contexts in (commutative and noncommutative) ring theory. See for instance [1,2,9,12,14,15,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%