2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2015.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Troodontidae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Abstract: To date three taxa of troodontid theropod dinosaurs have been recognized from Upper Cretaceous strata in two regions of the Kyzylkum Desert in Uzbekistan. The Cenomanian Khodzhakul Formation in the southwestern Kyzylkum Desert has yielded isolated serrated teeth and some postcranial bones of an indeterminate troodontid. In the central Kyzylkum Desert troodontids are known from the Cenomanian Dzharakuduk Formation (Urbacodon itemirensis) and the Turonian Bissekty Formation (Urbacodon sp.). Urbacodon itemirensis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…90-92 million years ago) Bissekty Formation of Uzbekistan. This formation has recently emerged as one of the most important records of midCretaceous dinosaurs globally (9)(10)(11). Possible tyrannosauroid specimens from the Bissekty Formation were reported more than a half century ago (12), and, more recently, several isolated fossils were assigned to the group (9, 13), but none of these has been particularly complete or diagnostic at the species level, and their phylogenetic relationships have been difficult to assess.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90-92 million years ago) Bissekty Formation of Uzbekistan. This formation has recently emerged as one of the most important records of midCretaceous dinosaurs globally (9)(10)(11). Possible tyrannosauroid specimens from the Bissekty Formation were reported more than a half century ago (12), and, more recently, several isolated fossils were assigned to the group (9, 13), but none of these has been particularly complete or diagnostic at the species level, and their phylogenetic relationships have been difficult to assess.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral surfaces apparently lack pneumatic foramina, though the rough surfaces suggest the caudals have been seriously weathered. The ventral surface of the centra are marked by a distinct shallow groove as in other troodontids (Averianov & Sues 2016; Zanno et al . 2011).…”
Section: Methods For Mi-ct Scanmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Other detailed morphology of the postzygapophysis remains unclear due to erosion. No trace of a spinopostzygapophyseal fossa is present, a feature that differs from Urbacodon (Averianov & Sues 2016). In anterior or posterior views, the neural canal is oval shaped, which is roughly as big as the spinoprezygapophyseal fossa (Fig.…”
Section: Methods For Mi-ct Scanmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dorsal surface is dominated by a broad, parasagitally oriented groove that extends from the posterior end of the nasal suture towards the supratemporal ridge. This groove is often cited as a distinctive characteristic of troodontids (Evans et al 2014;Makovicky and Norell 2004), and contrasts with the flat condition seen in adult dromaeosaurids and ornithomimids (Currie 1987b;Longrich 2008a), and the weakly concave frontals of therizinosaurs (Averianov 2016;Averianov and Sues 2016). Laterally, this groove defines a strongly upturned orbital rim.…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 85%