2011
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2011.56.5.1866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophic cycling and carbon export relationships in the California Current Ecosystem

Abstract: We constructed a simple non-steady-state model of trophic cycling relationships in the California Current Ecosystem and tested its predictions of mesozooplankton fecal-pellet export against vertical carbon-flux measurements by the 234 Th method taken during Lagrangian experiments. To assess trophic relationships, we simultaneously measured 14 C-primary production and chlorophyll-based rate estimates of phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton grazing, mesozooplankton grazing, and net phytoplankton growth. Study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
68
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phytoplankton export can be due to vertical transport (sinking), lateral transport (advection) or grazing (e.g. LEGENDRE; STUKEL et al, 2011;ADJOU et al, 2012;TORTAJADA et al, 2012). Small cells are able to remain in suspension longer due to their high surface/volume ratio (GUENTHER; BOZELLI, 2004), and lateral transport is not size selective.…”
Section: Phytoplanktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phytoplankton export can be due to vertical transport (sinking), lateral transport (advection) or grazing (e.g. LEGENDRE; STUKEL et al, 2011;ADJOU et al, 2012;TORTAJADA et al, 2012). Small cells are able to remain in suspension longer due to their high surface/volume ratio (GUENTHER; BOZELLI, 2004), and lateral transport is not size selective.…”
Section: Phytoplanktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, in shorter food chains (e.g., near the bottom: autotrophic microplanktonmesozooplankton), a greater amount of carbon is available for export (e.g. LEGENDRE; LE FEVRE, 1989;VARGAS et al, 2007;STUKEL et al, 2011). Since the bottom layer is moving towards the inner bay while the surface layer is flowing outwards, at least during neap tide periods, if the carbon balance at each of these layers is positive (i.e., export higher than regeneration), it will result in export in both directions .…”
Section: Trophic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grazing loss is an important process in the classical pathway as the fate of phytoplankton 20 production not grazed is either through horizontal export into adjacent waters or sinking (Cloern et al 1985, Turner 2002, Stukel et al 2011. From a cross-compilation of 66 studies, Calbet and Landry (2004) revealed that grazing loss accounts for 60 -75% of daily phytoplankton production, and is higher in estuarine and coastal waters than in oceanic waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Export production in the California Current EcosystemSeveral studies based on both in situ (Thunell 1998;Stukel et al 2011) and modeling (Olivieri and Chavez 2000) approaches suggest that POC export may be inversely related to PP in the California Current Ecosystem. These studies also suggest that much of the organic material fixed in high-productivity regions inshore of the California Current may be advected offshore in the Ekman layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent 14 C-PP estimates for the CalCOFI region using the same 24 h in situ methodology employed at HOT also suggest that on-deck incubations underestimate 14 C-PP. Stukel et al (2011) (where the CalCOFI 14 C-PP has been scaled to a 24 h rate using the factor of 1.81 discussed above). We also note that recent comparisons of mixed-layer 17 D-GOP and 14 C-PP off the central California coast (D. Munro unpubl.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%