2021
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophic niche overlap between native freshwater mussels (Order: Unionida) and the invasive Corbicula fluminea

Abstract: 1. Freshwater mussels (Order Unionida) are highly threatened. Interspecific competition for food sources with invasive alien species is considered to be one of the factors responsible for their decline because successful invaders are expected to have wider trophic niches and more flexible feeding strategies than their native counterparts.2. In this study, carbon (δ 13 C: 13 C/ 12 C) and nitrogen (δ 15 N: 15 N/ 14 N) stable isotopes were used to investigate the trophic niche overlap between the native freshwate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas all models were improvements over the null model, the best supported one included the full set of abiotic and biotic factors, suggesting that native mussels and Corbicula occupy similar stream habitats. This is contrary to our expectations that native mussels and Corbicula would limit each other's distribution as predicted by limiting similarity hypothesis (Macarthur & Levins, 1967) and previous works showing negative interactions (Ferreira‐Rodríguez, Fandiño, et al, 2018; Ferreira‐Rodríguez, Sousa, et al, 2018; Modesto et al, 2019, 2021; Vaughn & Spooner, 2006a). Thus, suggesting that niche requirements in these contemporary river habitats may not be limiting to either group or other mechanisms, such as positive interactions, may be at play (Silknetter et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas all models were improvements over the null model, the best supported one included the full set of abiotic and biotic factors, suggesting that native mussels and Corbicula occupy similar stream habitats. This is contrary to our expectations that native mussels and Corbicula would limit each other's distribution as predicted by limiting similarity hypothesis (Macarthur & Levins, 1967) and previous works showing negative interactions (Ferreira‐Rodríguez, Fandiño, et al, 2018; Ferreira‐Rodríguez, Sousa, et al, 2018; Modesto et al, 2019, 2021; Vaughn & Spooner, 2006a). Thus, suggesting that niche requirements in these contemporary river habitats may not be limiting to either group or other mechanisms, such as positive interactions, may be at play (Silknetter et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Freshwater habitats of the Anthropocene are characterized by excessive nutrient loads due to difficulties managing non‐point source pollution inputs (e.g., fertilizer runoff) and may affect species interactions (Strayer, 2014). Studies of the trophic niche of Corbicula often conclude that it is highly flexible and overlaps with the trophic niche of native mussel species, but the extent varies with ecological context (Atkinson et al, 2010; Modesto et al, 2021), and such flexibility can facilitate invasion success (Moyle & Light, 1996; Olsson et al, 2009). We anticipated that nutrient loading would increase quality (increased nutrient content) and quantity of particulate food sources, alleviating competition for food resources between Corbicula and mussels, thereby allowing co‐occurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to our initial hypothesis, C. fluminea did not reduce TN and TP levels in the water, but led to an increase in NO 3 − -N concentrations. C. fluminea can feed on phytoplankton and suspended particulate matter from the water column [53][54][55]. Their ability to reduce suspended particulate matter and phytoplankton biomass in the water column has long been recorded [56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrence records for mussel and fish species in the Douro River basin were obtained in three annual campaigns in June 2017, 2018, and 2019 and complemented with data from primary literature and technical reports (e.g., Dias et al, 2020; Modesto et al, 2021). During the field surveys, fish and mussel assemblages were sampled at the same sites and simultaneously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%