2018
DOI: 10.17138/tgft(6)1-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropical forage legumes for environmental benefits: An overview

Abstract: Ruminant livestock production in the tropics, particularly when based on pastures, is frequently blamed for being detrimental to the environment, allegedly contributing to: (1) degradation and destruction of ecosystems, including degradation and loss of soil, water and biodiversity; and (2) climate change (global warming). In this paper we argue that, rather than being detrimental, tropical forage legumes can have a positive impact on the environment, mainly due to key attributes that characterize the Legumino… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For a range of experiments in Queensland, Coates et al (1997) described an advantage of 30–60 kg/head/year for cattle grazing pastures including Verano ( S. hamata ) and/or Seca ( S. scabra ). In the Llanos of Colombia, annual liveweight gain advantage for cattle grazing gamba grass ( Andropogon gayanus ) mixed with S. capitata ranged from 40 to 60 kg/head/year (Schultze‐Kraft et al, 2018), also superior than observed in the current study. This lesser impact of mixed pastures on ADG could be explained by the greater quality (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 38%
“…For a range of experiments in Queensland, Coates et al (1997) described an advantage of 30–60 kg/head/year for cattle grazing pastures including Verano ( S. hamata ) and/or Seca ( S. scabra ). In the Llanos of Colombia, annual liveweight gain advantage for cattle grazing gamba grass ( Andropogon gayanus ) mixed with S. capitata ranged from 40 to 60 kg/head/year (Schultze‐Kraft et al, 2018), also superior than observed in the current study. This lesser impact of mixed pastures on ADG could be explained by the greater quality (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 38%
“…The development of legume-based grassland-livestock systems is considered a pillar for more sustainable and competitive ruminant production systems in the future (Lüscher et al, 2014;Schultze-Kraft et al, 2018). There have been relatively few quantitative studies of the impact of legume introduction on SOC accumulation ( Jensen et al, 2012), but the consensus is that forage legumes increase the rate of soil C sequestration (Cong et al, 2014).…”
Section: Presence Of Legumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our estimates of N attenuation in crop and pasture systems are close to the global average N use efficiency of 47% (Lassaletta et al, ) and agree with estimates for Florida production systems (Prasad & Hochmuth, ). While legumes are often identified as a more sustainable N source (Schultze‐Kraft et al, ), the results from Desormeaux et al () suggest that conventional cultivation of legumes can potentially contribute to net N inputs leached below the root zone. While legumes account for only 2% of N inputs in the springshed and therefore did not contribute significantly to spring N export, this has implications for catchments with higher contributions from agricultural BNF (e.g., Sobota et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%