2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8040347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropical Forest Fire Susceptibility Mapping at the Cat Ba National Park Area, Hai Phong City, Vietnam, Using GIS-Based Kernel Logistic Regression

Abstract: Abstract:The Cat Ba National Park area (Vietnam) with its tropical forest is recognized as being part of the world biodiversity conservation by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and is a well-known destination for tourists, with around 500,000 travelers per year. This area has been the site for many research projects; however, no project has been carried out for forest fire susceptibility assessment. Thus, protection of the forest including fire prevention is one of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the training of the SVR model required finding the best values for the two meta-parameters, the regularization parameter (C), and the kernel width (γ). For this task, the grid search method was used, as seen in Reference [66,67]. Accordingly, the SVR model was constructed using the best C = 18 and γ = 0.102 for the SVR model with the Sentinel-2A dataset, while the best C = 17 and γ = 0.102 were found for the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 dataset.…”
Section: Support Vector Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the training of the SVR model required finding the best values for the two meta-parameters, the regularization parameter (C), and the kernel width (γ). For this task, the grid search method was used, as seen in Reference [66,67]. Accordingly, the SVR model was constructed using the best C = 18 and γ = 0.102 for the SVR model with the Sentinel-2A dataset, while the best C = 17 and γ = 0.102 were found for the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 dataset.…”
Section: Support Vector Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the investment of resources and time required to suppress wildfires, efficient and adaptable techniques are needed to rapidly estimate the likelihood of fire occurrence. The first extensive works on predicting wildfire probability date back to Chuvieco and Congalton [12] in Spain and De Vliegher [13] in Greece, which were significantly elaborated by recent works [14][15][16], demonstrating that the future wildfires tend to occur under similar local conditions that caused them in the past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Wildfire predictive modeling is typically performed in the following five steps [2,7,11,[14][15][16]: (1) Detecting and documenting historical fire events; (2) identifying a set of wildfire influencing factors; (3) seeking the potential relationships between the influencing factors and the historical fires; (4) elaborating a spatially explicit distribution map of wildfire probability; and (5) assessing the reliability of the probability map and its utility for predicting the location of future fires. Over the past decades, researchers mostly focused on step three of this methodology and evaluated various models in an explicitly spatial way to fully explore the pattern of wildfire occurrences in response to different geo-environmental factors [2,7,[14][15][16]. Apart from the machine learning techniques that have emerged in recent years [14,15], bivariate and multivariate methods have always been the most commonly used modeling approaches [7,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SA supports the researcher to analyze the significance of subjectivity components and produces useful information on the importance of weighting values assigned to the corresponding parameters. SA has been widely used and proposed to validate index and rating methods in different fields of study, including FFR assessment [62][63][64][65][66]. The effective weighting was calculated using the following equation:…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%