1995
DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712152802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tropospheric dispersion: The first ten days after a puff release

Abstract: Dispersion from a puff released in the atmospheric boundary layer in mid‐latitudes is simulated with a Lagrangian global multiple‐particle model using analysed three‐dimensional wind fields. Quantitative measures of the spread are computed and used to assess the influence of the synoptic system into which the puff is released, and the ways in which turbulent diffusion can contribute to the total spread. the nature of the dispersion over ten days is examined to elucidate the controlling meteorology and kinemati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, emissions from major point sources are badly represented by Eulerian models since they are usually assumed to mix immediately within a grid cell, whereas a typical point‐source plume (e.g., from a power plant) does not expand to the size of the grid cell for a substantial time period. This leads to an unrealistic near‐source modeling, especially since the K‐theory approach often used in Eulerian models does not properly represent the diffusion in the vicinity of the source [ Maryon and Buckland , 1995]. Numerical problems can also be raised, such as oscillations caused by strong gradients due to point sources [ Brandt et al , 1996], if a nonmonotonic advection scheme is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, emissions from major point sources are badly represented by Eulerian models since they are usually assumed to mix immediately within a grid cell, whereas a typical point‐source plume (e.g., from a power plant) does not expand to the size of the grid cell for a substantial time period. This leads to an unrealistic near‐source modeling, especially since the K‐theory approach often used in Eulerian models does not properly represent the diffusion in the vicinity of the source [ Maryon and Buckland , 1995]. Numerical problems can also be raised, such as oscillations caused by strong gradients due to point sources [ Brandt et al , 1996], if a nonmonotonic advection scheme is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turbulent flow of a plume can be typified considering by the relative dispersion of Lagrangian particles [ Maryon and Buckland , 1995; Huber et al , 2001; Colette and Ancellet , 2006]. The root‐mean square (rms) distance in time , σ r (t) , is defined relative to the average position of the plume as: where N is the number of particles, and d i (t) is the distance of each particle from the center of the plume at time t (counted forward), considering both the meridional and zonal separations.…”
Section: Vertical and Horizontal Atmospheric Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite‐time Lyapunov exponent describes the stretching processes in the atmosphere given the following expression [ Maryon and Buckland , 1995; Cohen and Kreitzberg , 1997; Stohl , 2001; Huber et al , 2001; Colette and Ancellet , 2006] where Δ r(0) is an arbitrary horizontal distance between particles at the initial point and Δ r(t) is their distance after a time t (counted forward) accounted as the standard deviation distance of particles from the mean position of the plume; and τ is the characteristic timescale of the dispersing eddies, called typical eddy turnover time. If at any time λ > 0, we say that the system is chaotic [ Pierrehumbert and Yang , 1993].…”
Section: Vertical and Horizontal Atmospheric Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…International protocols are in place for the management of such emergencies, and extensive collaborative work has been carried out on the testing and intercomparison of transport and dispersion models (for example, Mosca et al, 1998). Transports of airborne pathogens, and biota in general, also require suitable transport and dispersion models which, in brief, have been applied to pollution problems and the physics of atmospheric dispersion on all motion scales from street canyons to global diffusion (Maryon and Buckland, 1995). A second area of aerosol and gaseous transport studies of pressing importance is concerned with the evolution of climate forcing and change, in which sulphate aerosol and volcanic ef¯uent are just two of a range of airborne substances subject to intensive investigation, typically involving general circulation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%