2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45085-6_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRP++ 2.0: A Temporal Resolution Prover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique is showing impressively fast results via the implementation Aalta v2.0. The timings presented in the appendix of [12] show that this is much faster on most of the benchmarks than LS4 [20], TRP++ [7], NuXmv-BMCINC [6], and the tableaux/automata reasoner Aalta v1.2 from [9]. Aalta 2.0 does seem to perform significantly faster than the other tools almost across the benchmarks so it will be interesting to see in future work whether the speed-ups that we are seeing in parallel tableaux techniques can challenge this in any way.…”
Section: Parallel Tableaux As Contributor To Portfolio Reasonersmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This technique is showing impressively fast results via the implementation Aalta v2.0. The timings presented in the appendix of [12] show that this is much faster on most of the benchmarks than LS4 [20], TRP++ [7], NuXmv-BMCINC [6], and the tableaux/automata reasoner Aalta v1.2 from [9]. Aalta 2.0 does seem to perform significantly faster than the other tools almost across the benchmarks so it will be interesting to see in future work whether the speed-ups that we are seeing in parallel tableaux techniques can challenge this in any way.…”
Section: Parallel Tableaux As Contributor To Portfolio Reasonersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They include tableaux pltl [19], resolution TRP++ [7], resolution LS4 [20], symbolic model verification NuSMV [2], and automata Aalta [11]. Surprisingly (or is it unsurprisingly?…”
Section: A New One-pass Embarrassingly Parallel Ltl Tableaumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each problem and for both calculi we report the number of clauses in the input, the number of derived 3 clauses and literals, and the number of subsumed clauses. For comparison, we also include in the last two columns clause data obtained by running the temporal prover TRP++ [17] 4 , which also implements the CTR calculus, to provide evidence that our experimental results are not biased. We used the default mode (no extra options) for running TRP++ and collected the information on the number of generated and subsumed clauses from the output the prover by default provides.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, first order temporal problems are very complex, but there are automatic methods for both propositional [72,97] and significant fragments of first-order [47,105,98] temporal logics. While individual modal, temporal, or description logics have been studied extensively in the past, much less is known about combinations of modal logics and, in particular, about practical proof methods for such combinations [22].…”
Section: • Temporal Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%