1984
DOI: 10.1093/cs/6.3.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truants and the Court: A Diversionary Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an illustration, shoplifting arrests fell 60% in Van Nuys, California, when police conducted a three-week truancy sweep (Garry, 1996). In an experimental study of the effect of truants and their families who received information and/or services from probation officers, those who received services were less likely to return to court for truancy (Stewart & Ray, 1984). Yet, these truants were just as likely as control group truants to return to the court for other criminal offenses.…”
Section: Truancy Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an illustration, shoplifting arrests fell 60% in Van Nuys, California, when police conducted a three-week truancy sweep (Garry, 1996). In an experimental study of the effect of truants and their families who received information and/or services from probation officers, those who received services were less likely to return to court for truancy (Stewart & Ray, 1984). Yet, these truants were just as likely as control group truants to return to the court for other criminal offenses.…”
Section: Truancy Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, these truants were just as likely as control group truants to return to the court for other criminal offenses. Stewart and Ray (1984) hypothesize that the recidivism rates were just starting to fall after three years of the program and that more time was needed to effect rates of recidivism.…”
Section: Truancy Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%