True and Fair Override: Accounting Expert Opinions, Explanations from Behavioural Theories, and Discussions for Sustainability Accounting

Abstract

This study focuses on true and fair view (TFV) and fair presentation (FP) in financial statements. It questions if attitudes towards the true and fair override (TFO) condition, included in European Union (EU) legislation and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), is indicative of a principles-based approach or lip service to a concept that is rarely applied. We address this subject because we consider that there should be a consensus and harmonisation on TFV—that TFO has a vital role within the principles-based framework, and while the accounting standard development process should limit the application of the TFO concept, in practice, it is an important reporting option. TFV/TFO harmonisation also has an important role in sustainability accounting, to reveal company actions which are influenced by more than just the objective of complying with the standards. In the empirical part, accounting experts from 24 European countries were surveyed. Their responses suggest a lack of clarity around the distinction between TFV and FP and a reluctance to consider, in practice, the application of the TFO. Drawing on behavioural theories—ostrich effect and comfort theory—we find explanations and reasoning behind attitudes to these cornerstone concepts. Specifically, we try to explain behavioural attitudes to TFV/FP and TFO positions, which defend uncompromising compliance with standards.

Untitled

“…On the whole, it can be concluded that the mounting pressure towards the firms for increasing their contribution to the social, environmental, and governance goals, the establishment, and evolution of standardized and scrutinized measurement of that very contribution has changed financial norms and accounting practices. In the opinion of Garvey et al (2021), businesses look at the integration patterns and trends of the ESG issues within the manager's investment process to decide on their approach towards the execution of stewardship responsibilities as crucial as the voting activities or corporate and industry engagement. Thus, environmental accounting and sustainability reporting has become more of a growth industry itself with rising academic initiatives (environmental and social economics), professional branches (environmental accountants, auditors), and non-profit motives of altruists.…”

An Exploratory Study of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) from a Christian Perspective

“…Under such conditions, a principlesbased accounting practice that allows managers more opportunities to exercise professional judgment appears questionable to IFRS opponents. Yet, Hoogervorst claimed that a principles-based accounting practice fosters an environment that offers more opportunities to minimize moral hazard (Garvey et al, 2021). This claim is not novel to the financial world.…”

The barriers to adapting accounting practices to circular economy implementation: an evidence from Ghana

“…SA, also known as corporate responsibility (CR) reporting, corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting and environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting, is concerned with the measurement and reporting of a company’s sustainability-related programs and policies to stakeholders (Ascani et al , 2021; Garvey et al , 2021; Ramesh and Achanta, 2021). SA investigates activities that have a significant impact on environmental issues, social issues, resource sustainability and firm sustainability (Ascani et al , 2021; Garvey et al , 2021; Ramesh and Achanta, 2021). These dimensions, while industry- and firm-specific, cover a wide range of topics such as the environment, employee and community relations and human rights, among others.…”