2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2014.08.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True coincidence summing correction and mathematical efficiency modeling of a well detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the correction factor obtained at 1120.29 keV and the TCS factor and the ratio ε ε / exp sim is due to the weak count rate in this line. The correction factors determined in three different ways are in good agreement and are close to those obtained in the literature for the most of values [8,22]. For both lines at 1764.5 keV and 2204.1 keV, there are significant differences compared with the values from the literature.…”
Section: True Coincidence Summing Correctionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The difference between the correction factor obtained at 1120.29 keV and the TCS factor and the ratio ε ε / exp sim is due to the weak count rate in this line. The correction factors determined in three different ways are in good agreement and are close to those obtained in the literature for the most of values [8,22]. For both lines at 1764.5 keV and 2204.1 keV, there are significant differences compared with the values from the literature.…”
Section: True Coincidence Summing Correctionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For 214 Bi, we have considered height major lines (with the most important intensities) from its numerous γ radiations. We assumed that 226 Ra is in secular equilibrium with its progenies, which implies that they have the same activity, and we have compared the 214 Bi activity with that of 214 Pb, which is free from TCS at 351.9 keV and slightly affected with 1.9% at 295.38 keV [8]. Table 6 shows the TCS correction factors calculated for the major lines of 214 Bi in three different ways: Ratio ε exp / ε sim : that is the ratio between the experimental efficiency and the efficiency calculated from the MCNP6 simulations.…”
Section: True Coincidence Summing Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…energy depositions from all crystals in the 𝛾 array, which will be called the "add-back-all" algorithm. This is because the 𝛾 array is like a well-type detector where crystals with energy depositions may be far apart [34]. However, for events with more than 2 𝛾-rays emitted simultaneously, this method is invalid.…”
Section: Jinst 19 T05019mentioning
confidence: 99%