2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4927193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True coincidence summing corrections for an extended energy range HPGe detector

Abstract: Calibration of 4π NaI(Tl) detectors with coincidence summing correction using new numerical procedure and ANGLE4 software AIP Advances 7, 035005 (2017) Abstract. True coincidence summing (TCS) effect for natural radioactive families of U-238 and Th-232 represents a problem when an environmental sample with a close source-detector geometry measurement is performed. By using a certified multi-nuclide standard source to calibrate an energy extended range (XtRa) HPGe detector, it is possible to obtain an intensity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a given radionuclide, the magnitude of true coincidence summing (summing in or summing out) is strongly dependent on the peak and total detection e ciencies as well as on the decay scheme of the radionuclide. The true coincidence summing, hence, become signi cant at close detector-to-source distances owing to a greater probability of two or more γ-rays reaching the detector within the resolving time of the detector [11]. In practice, measuring or computing peak and total detection e ciency for a close detector to source distance is cumbersome and complicated and might yield biased results [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given radionuclide, the magnitude of true coincidence summing (summing in or summing out) is strongly dependent on the peak and total detection e ciencies as well as on the decay scheme of the radionuclide. The true coincidence summing, hence, become signi cant at close detector-to-source distances owing to a greater probability of two or more γ-rays reaching the detector within the resolving time of the detector [11]. In practice, measuring or computing peak and total detection e ciency for a close detector to source distance is cumbersome and complicated and might yield biased results [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%