2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-020-07037-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True Event-Driven and Fault-Tolerant Routing in Wireless Sensor Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An event-driven routing between event and fault disambiguation is a very big challenge. Biswas et al [82] present a true event-driven and fault-tolerant routing (TEDFTR) algorithm for event-driven routing. When an event occurs, any node sends events occurrence information report to the base station through multi hopping with the help of the TEDFTR algorithm.…”
Section: Event-driven Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An event-driven routing between event and fault disambiguation is a very big challenge. Biswas et al [82] present a true event-driven and fault-tolerant routing (TEDFTR) algorithm for event-driven routing. When an event occurs, any node sends events occurrence information report to the base station through multi hopping with the help of the TEDFTR algorithm.…”
Section: Event-driven Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For low-energy and fault-prone sensor nodes that are vulnerable, Biswas et al [12] presented a true event-driven and fault-tolerant routing (TED-FTR) algorithm that sends a report to the BS through multiple hops. The ambiguity of the fault measurements is eliminated using the majority voting algorithm among neighbors to identify an actual event.…”
Section: Majority Rule and Hamming Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If most neighbors experience identical but unusual results, the node considers it an event and sends a report to the BS. In [12], majority voting is performed to disambiguate the reporting event of neighbor nodes. The majority voting algorithm uses Equation (2), which is given below.…”
Section: Majority Rule and Hamming Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Event-driven and priority message congestion detection techniques start a congestion detection algorithm whenever event-driven messages about traffic jams, road accidents are detected or generated. Fadilah et al and Biswas et al [44,45] proposed the use of adaptive periodic beaconing to convey time gap data. The adaptive rate control algorithm varies the rate of Periodic Safety Message (PSM) generation based on vehicular safety.…”
Section: Event-driven and Priority-based Congestion Detection Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%