2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-016-0475-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

True syntopy between chromosomal races of the Cryptocercus punctulatus wood-roach species complex

Abstract: In this paper, genetic evidence for local cooccurrence (syntopy) between members of two chromosomal races within the Cryptocercus punctulatus species complex from the Southern Appalachian Mountains is presented. This phenomenon has not previously been detected, despite extensive sampling and numerous molecular studies of this the sub-social wood-roach spanning the past 20 years. The incidence of syntopy seems rare; it was detected in one of 70 rotting logs sampled across eight states in the southern United Sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Divergent mtDNA lineages have been documented within numerous species of forest invertebrates from the southern Appalachian Mountains and surrounding areas, but in most cases, spatial distributions are allopatric. For example, the wood-feeding cockroach, Cryptocercus punctulatus (Blattodea: Cryptocercidae), is comprised of five mtDNA clades [43,44], and, although three of these occur in close proximity in the Great Smoky Mountains, they are locally non-overlapping (but see Garrick [45] for an anomaly). Similarly, the leaf-litter-dwelling flightless weevil, Eurhoptus pyriformis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is comprised of at least two lineages that show a spatial-genetic discontinuity in the vicinity of the Smoky Mountains [46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divergent mtDNA lineages have been documented within numerous species of forest invertebrates from the southern Appalachian Mountains and surrounding areas, but in most cases, spatial distributions are allopatric. For example, the wood-feeding cockroach, Cryptocercus punctulatus (Blattodea: Cryptocercidae), is comprised of five mtDNA clades [43,44], and, although three of these occur in close proximity in the Great Smoky Mountains, they are locally non-overlapping (but see Garrick [45] for an anomaly). Similarly, the leaf-litter-dwelling flightless weevil, Eurhoptus pyriformis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is comprised of at least two lineages that show a spatial-genetic discontinuity in the vicinity of the Smoky Mountains [46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Indeed, C. punctulatus from highly divergent genetic lineages—including those that likely differ in chromosome number—may occasionally co-inhabit the same log (Garrick, 2016). Accordingly, depending on the goals of the study, it may be prudent to sample multiple individuals from a log.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two or three adults per log (mean = 2.78) were used for molecular analyses. DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction amplification, sequencing, alignment and validation of data from mtDNA cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and subunit II (COII) genes followed Garrick (2016), and characteristics of the molecular dataset are summarized in Table 1. For each individual, COI+COII sequences were concatenated (1,125-bp), and each rotting log was classified as containing cockroaches with the same mtDNA haplotype vs .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were used for molecular analyses. DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction amplification, sequencing, alignment and validation of data from mtDNA cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and subunit II (COII) genes followed Garrick (2016), and characteristics of the molecular dataset are summarized in Table 1. For each individual, COI+COII sequences were concatenated (1125bp), and each rotting log was classified as containing cockroaches with the same mtDNA haplotype vs. two or more different mtDNA haplotypes (i.e., single-haplotype vs. multihaplotype logs).…”
Section: Sampling and Rotting Log Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the majority of co-occurring haplotypes have few mutational differences, some divergences are more substantial (Figure 2). Indeed, C. punctulatus from highly divergent genetic lineages-including those that likely differ in chromosome number-may occasionally co-inhabit the same log (Garrick 2016). Accordingly, depending on the goals of the study, it may be prudent to sample multiple individuals from a log.…”
Section: Genetic Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%