Aging Policy and Politics in the Trump Era 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9780429021435-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trump and the GOP agenda: implications for retirement policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…“It's not that you just have to be with the president on policy—you can't question his behavior and still be a Republican in good standing, apparently, in a Republican primary” (quoted in Edelman 2017): In explaining his decision not to seek re‐election, former Senator Jeff Flake (R‐AZ) pointed to the electoral difficulties he faced as a result of his public criticism of then‐President Donald Trump. Despite voting with the Republican Party 99% of the time in 2017 (“CQ Vote Studies” 2018)—including on signature Republican agenda items such as efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act and the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court—Flake had little support among Arizona Republicans by the end of 2017 (Prokop 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“It's not that you just have to be with the president on policy—you can't question his behavior and still be a Republican in good standing, apparently, in a Republican primary” (quoted in Edelman 2017): In explaining his decision not to seek re‐election, former Senator Jeff Flake (R‐AZ) pointed to the electoral difficulties he faced as a result of his public criticism of then‐President Donald Trump. Despite voting with the Republican Party 99% of the time in 2017 (“CQ Vote Studies” 2018)—including on signature Republican agenda items such as efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act and the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court—Flake had little support among Arizona Republicans by the end of 2017 (Prokop 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%