2005
DOI: 10.1247/csf.29.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truncation of the Projection Domain of MAP4 (Microtubule-Associated Protein 4) Leads to Attenuation of Microtubule Dynamic Instability

Abstract: ABSTRACT. MAP4, a ubiquitous heat-stable MAP, is composed of an asymmetric structure common to the heatstable MAPs, consisting of an N-terminal projection (PJ) domain and a C-terminal microtubule (MT)-binding (MTB) domain. Although the MTB domain has been intensively studied, the role of the PJ domain, which protrudes from MT-wall and does not bind to MTs, remains unclear. We investigated the roles of the PJ domain on the dynamic instability of MTs by dark-field microscopy using various PJ domain deletion cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, fusion proteins consisting solely of the MAP4 projection domain do not bind to microtubules in vitro (44,45). What is known about the role of the projection domain in MAP4 interactions with microtubules is that, as might be expected, it affects the spacing and packing of the microtubule array (46), and its presence also appears to be important for normal microtubule dynamic instability (47). Further, evidence derived from an expression construct of the MAP4 projection domain indicates that, although it does not bind to microtubules, it does have a major effect on the activity of the MAP4 microtubulebinding domain; of special interest here, this has been thought to be mediated by phosphorylation of one or more potential sites in the MAP4 projection domain (44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, fusion proteins consisting solely of the MAP4 projection domain do not bind to microtubules in vitro (44,45). What is known about the role of the projection domain in MAP4 interactions with microtubules is that, as might be expected, it affects the spacing and packing of the microtubule array (46), and its presence also appears to be important for normal microtubule dynamic instability (47). Further, evidence derived from an expression construct of the MAP4 projection domain indicates that, although it does not bind to microtubules, it does have a major effect on the activity of the MAP4 microtubulebinding domain; of special interest here, this has been thought to be mediated by phosphorylation of one or more potential sites in the MAP4 projection domain (44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included MAP4, which increases the rescue frequency of microtubules (Permana et al, 2005) and reduces vesicle motility and organelle movement (Bulinski et al, 1997), and was down-regulated over the time course. The expression of KIFC3, which has been implicated in Golgi positioning and apical transport (Noda et al, 2001;Xu et al, 2002) was increased.…”
Section: Microtubulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of MAPs have been identified in different cell types and they perform various functions, for example, the fine tuning of MT dynamics to stabilize and destabilize MTs when guiding MTs towards specific cellular locations, MT cross-linking, and mediating interactions between MTs and other proteins [16], [17], [18]. MAP4 is found in nearly all cell types and is responsible for stabilization of MTs [19]. Takahashi et al [20] reported that overexpression of MAP4 caused a shift of tubulin dimers to a polymerized fraction and formed dense, stable MT networks; overexpression also caused elevated tubulin expression and altered MT network properties [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%