Trust and betrayal in war

Ajduković, Dean; Čorkalo, Dinka

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720352.019

Cited by 20 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, both Israeli Jews and Palestinians perceive themselves as the unequivocal victims of the Israeli‐Arab conflict and accuse the other group of being the victimizer (Bar‐Tal, 2007; Caplan, 1999; Rouhana & Bar‐Tal, 1998). The same holds true for Catholics and Protestants in the violent context of Northern Ireland (Cairns, Mallet, Lewis, & Wilson, 2003), Greek and Turkish in Cyprus (Hadjipavlou, 2007), or Serbs and Croats in the former Yugoslavia (Ajduković & Čorkalo Biruški, 2004; Kosic & Tauber, 2010; Volkan, 1997).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Reducing Competitive Victimhood in Kosovo: The Role of Extended Contact and Common Ingroup Identity

Andrighetto

Mari

Volpato

et al. 2012

Political Psychology

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Reducing Competitive Victimhood in Kosovo: The Role of Extended Contact and Common Ingroup Identity

Andrighetto

Mari

Volpato

et al. 2012

Political Psychology

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is all likely to be associated with hopelessness and ideas of ending one's life. Ajdukovic and Corkalo [1] described deep psychological injury and high levels of distrust between community members from two ethnic groups 11 years after the war. These were attributed to the failure of interethnic friends and neighbours to forewarn each other about imminent life threatening danger and to provide protection or support at the critical times.…”

Section: Comparison With Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Trauma and suicidality in war affected communities

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract\ud PURPOSE:\ud The aim was to assess whether experiences of war trauma remain directly associated with suicidality in war affected communities when other risk factors are considered.\ud MATERIALS AND METHODS:\ud In the main sample 3313 participants from former Yugoslavia who experienced war trauma were recruited using a random sampling in five Balkan countries. In the second sample 854 refugees from former Yugoslavia recruited through registers and networking in three Western European countries. Sociodemographic and data on trauma exposure, psychiatric diagnoses and level of suicidality were assessed.\ud RESULTS:\ud In the main sample 113 participants (3.4%) had high suicidality, which was associated with number of potentially traumatic war experiences (odds ratio 1.1) and war related imprisonment (odds ratio 3) once all measured risk factors were considered. These associations were confirmed in the refugee sample with a higher suicidality rate (10.2%).\ud DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:\ud Number of potentially traumatic war experiences, in particular imprisonment, may be considered as a relevant risk factor for suicidality in people affected by war

show abstract

“…A shift in ethnic sentiments seems to have occurred immediately before the breakdown of inter-ethnic communal life in Croatia (e.g., Corkalo Biruski et al, 2004 ). Distrust between communities quickly arose (Ajdukovic and Corkalo Biruski, 2004 ) and community interactions escalated into violent outbursts (Čorkalo Biruški, 2012 ). Such situations prevailed particularly in rural locations (Allcock, 2002 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Moral Judgments of In-Group and Out-Group Harm in Post-conflict Urban and Rural Croatian Communities

Moncrieff

Liénard

2018

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our research brings to light features of the social world that impact moral judgments and how they do so. The moral vignette data presented were collected in rural and urban Croatian communities that were involved to varying degrees in the Croatian Homeland War. We argue that rapid shifts in moral accommodations during periods of violent social strife can be explained by considering the role that coordination and social agents' ability to reconfigure their social network (i.e., relational mobility) play in moral reasoning. Social agents coordinate on (moral) norms, a general attitude which broadly facilitates cooperation, and makes possible the collective enforcement of compliance. During social strife interested parties recalibrate their determination of others' moral standing and recast their established moral circle, in accordance with their new or prevailing social investments. To that extent, social coordination—and its particular promoters, inhibitors, and determinants—effects significant changes in individuals' ranking of moral priorities. Results indicate that rural participants evaluate the harmful actions of third parties more harshly than urban participants. Coordination mediates that relationship between social environment and moral judgment. Coordination also matters more for the moral evaluation of the harmful actions of moral scenarios involving characters belonging to different social units than for scenarios involving characters belonging to the same group. Participants high in relational mobility—that ability to recompose one's social network—moralize similarly wrongdoings perpetrated by both in- and out-group members. Those low in relational mobility differentiate when an out-group member causes the harm. Additionally, perceptions of third-party guilt are also affected by specifics of the social environment. Overall, we find that social coordination and relational mobility affect moral reasoning more so than ethnic commitment.

show abstract

Trust and betrayal in war

Cited by 20 publications

References 0 publications

Reducing Competitive Victimhood in Kosovo: The Role of Extended Contact and Common Ingroup Identity

Reducing Competitive Victimhood in Kosovo: The Role of Extended Contact and Common Ingroup Identity

Trauma and suicidality in war affected communities

Moral Judgments of In-Group and Out-Group Harm in Post-conflict Urban and Rural Croatian Communities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About