2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2004.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizational alliances: a framework for facilitating knowledge sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
93
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
93
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a problem when some people are not interested in sharing their knowledge for different reasons such as lack of confidence on job security, lack of trust to others, etc. Panteli and Sockalingam (2005) investigated the impact of trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizational alliances in a framework for facilitating KS. Elias (2005) The effect of corporate ethical values on accountants' perceptions Of social responsibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a problem when some people are not interested in sharing their knowledge for different reasons such as lack of confidence on job security, lack of trust to others, etc. Panteli and Sockalingam (2005) investigated the impact of trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizational alliances in a framework for facilitating KS. Elias (2005) The effect of corporate ethical values on accountants' perceptions Of social responsibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As high quality of interaction is extremely essential for team learning [9], the author assumes that task conflict is closely related to team learning. Research shows that task conflict can promote sharing of knowledge in teams [10], 5th International Conference on Education, Management, Information and Medicine (EMIM 2015) trigger greater information exchange, revaluation of the status quo, and scrutiny of the task at hand [11,12]. Besides, it can also enhance the assessment process for the alternative proposals [13], and improve strategic decision-making [14].…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant body of knowledge regarding conflict management (including Angouri, 2012;De Dreu & Weingart, 2003;Dechurch, Hamilton, & Haas, 2007;Jeong et al, 2008;Leach, Mearns, & Scoones, 1999;Panteli & Sockalingam, 2005;Poitras, 2012;Schusler, Decker, & Pfeffer, 2003;Thomas, 1976Thomas, , 1992. Within this section, some well-cited conflict management models, which appear to be relevant to this study, will be reviewed.…”
Section: Conflict Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%